Forums36
Topics40,965
Posts558,016
Members18,506
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
13 members (Jason D, Boondoggle, STG, canyoncreek, phinfan, catscratch, Sunil, JoshMI, gautprod, Theo Gallus, Shorthose, rjackson, Bobbss),
1,253
guests, and
195
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 24 Likes: 1
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 24 Likes: 1 |
[quote=cb100]
A few years back the Supreme Court ruled that taking private property for a pharmaceutical company somehow fit the definition of public purpose, since it presumably increased property values & tax collections. Note shift from public "use" in Constitution to public "purpose." Exactly- the company was Pfizer. They sued to get this landmark case through the supreme court that is quietly unwinding civil rights. Land ownership is a fundamental right, and the fascist decision ends that right and concerts it to simple majority-provided privilege.
|
1 member likes this:
catscratch |
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|