|
|
|
Forums36
Topics40,963
Posts557,987
Members18,503
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
10 members (Boondoggle, Snipe, catscratch, Deancutler, Bobbss, esshup, Swamp_Yankee, FishinRod, Pat Williamson, Steve Clubb),
1,181
guests, and
255
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,387 Likes: 607
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,387 Likes: 607 |
You are exactly on track!
My statement, "The process is NOT additive" is ambiguous. (I see that it could be read that the "process of creating small dams" is not additive.)
I should have said the erosive energy is NOT additive.
A 90' drop is >>> greater than six 15' drops - even though the math is the same. The physics is not the same.
Any time you can break the water flow chain with a level surface of pooled water, you are reducing your erosion.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
