I have to wonder if maybe your goals for the lake are different than the neighborhood's. Split between a neighborhood, it should be affordable enough. Who's going to pay for feed? That's going cost a fair amount ... year after year after year. And then who's going to pay for dealing with all the excess nutrients? I mean who will pay for herbicides and dyes and grass carp and controlling toxic algae blooms? If the feeders aren't something the neighborhood can afford, then I question whether the neighborhood would be agreement with where this may lead.
It would be helpful to understand what the goals are more background into the history of the water and neighborhood community. What's changed to cause a different approach to management?
What's wrong with the lake's fishing as it is?
How many neighbors are using the lake for fishing?
Are there regulations in place?
Last edited by jpsdad; 11/27/20 08:57 AM.
