Forums36
Topics40,962
Posts557,962
Members18,501
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
7 members (FishinRod, Fishingadventure, 4CornersPuddle, Bigtrh24, Boondoggle, Bill Cody, Ponderific2024),
1,109
guests, and
322
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,748 Likes: 295
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,748 Likes: 295 |
JMayer, just a quick point on the muck from the bottom of the pond....
The jury is out, so to speak, on whether or not that muck is of good value as soil, if I recall correctly.
You may be able to get some reduction in the organic muck by either adding aeration or muck-reducing bacteria or microbes. Regarding the bacteria or microbes, a concern could be if you have too much flow-through water. I'm not sure that's the case though.
Excerpt from Robert Crais' "The Monkey's Raincoat:" "She took another microscopic bite of her sandwich, then pushed it away. Maybe she absorbed nutrients from her surroundings."
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|