Forums36
Topics41,012
Posts558,503
Members18,530
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
11 members (Bigtrh24, Augie, Brian from Texas, Chris Steelman, Justin W, esshup, Theo Gallus, Pat Williamson, Boondoggle, FishinRod, Sunil),
1,090
guests, and
272
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
No disagreement Zep. I'm sure that many positive benefits have come, and will continue to come from the program.
However I also tend to recognize that oftentimes, there are external factors associated with such endeavors. ($$$)
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|