Forums36
Topics41,020
Posts558,578
Members18,537
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
13 members (wps456, catscratch, canyoncreek, Boondoggle, fletchccc, Sunil, Stressless, rjackson, 2blade, Rick O, etx-pond-c, Theo Gallus, 4CornersPuddle),
868
guests, and
247
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2 |
I've done some further searching on this subject. One thing I've found in a few places is a warning that even biodegradable soaps are harmful to fish. Something called "surfactants" present in even biodegrabable soaps and detergants. excerpt from http://lists.saveourshores.org/pipermail/sos/2002-June/000002.html All soaps and detergents even the biodegradable ones, are toxic to fish and other aquatic life. The "surfactants" in most liquid detergents and shampoos is called sodium lauryl sulfate which destroys the oxygen exchange in the gills of fish. "Biodegradable" detergents still contain surfactants. In their water quality testing procedures for safe release of treated water or "effluent", the local sewage treatment plant, sewer authority midcoastline, uses the harmful sodium lauryl sulfate as a reference toxicant for our LD(Lethal Dose) 50 sensitivity check of their bioassay fish. The dose at which 50% of the fish die ranges from about 17 PPM (PARTS PER MILLION) to 30 PPM.I'm sure the volume of discharge and volume of water probably make a difference, but I guess I won't fool with it.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BG sex?
by Bill Cody - 05/16/24 08:50 PM
|
|
|
|