|
Forums36
Topics41,006
Posts558,420
Members18,525
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
6 members (Boondoggle, Ponderific2024, FishinRod, Bill Cody, Theo Gallus, catscratch),
1,101
guests, and
182
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
I don't know where you're at, but I'm working on getting some walleye this fall from Clear Creek Fisheries in Martinsville....not sure if it will happen, but more interest in this fish probably couldn't hurt the chances!
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|
BG sex?
by Theo Gallus - 05/11/24 08:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
