Forums36
Topics41,012
Posts558,503
Members18,530
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
11 members (Bigtrh24, Augie, Brian from Texas, Chris Steelman, Justin W, esshup, Theo Gallus, Pat Williamson, Boondoggle, FishinRod, Sunil),
1,090
guests, and
272
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,796 Likes: 14
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,796 Likes: 14 |
I dont think anyone is saying genetics are the only thing that matters but if you are willing to manage the fish to try to maximize the size, then yes genetics play a huge roll.
I look at it this way you have 4 options:
1. Bad/No management + "normal" genetics = high probability for smaller fish 2. Bad/No management + "great" genetics = medium probability for small fish 3. Good management + "normal" genetics = medium probability for big fish 4. Good management + "great" genetics = high probability for big fish This is excellent! So simple yet broken down beautifully. Very Luskesque!
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|