|
Forums36
Topics40,963
Posts558,000
Members18,506
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
9 members (Fishingadventure, Sunil, Cliff76169, jmartin, JasonInOhio, FishinRod, Deancutler, JoshMI, Joe7328),
1,433
guests, and
233
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,794
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,794 |
Permit me one qualifier.
When we stocked Richmond Mill Lake, I chose to stock some pure coppernose bluegill, some pure strains of natives and very likely some where intergrades of both strains.
While some of the photos above are definitely coppernose bluegill, some of them are likely crosses between natives and coppernose. So, don't assume all these fish are straight coppernose.
Those with brilliant copper-colored tails and the vivid copper band across their noses are definitely coppernose.
But, those with copperish-yellow dorsal fins may not be pure coppernose. Thanks Bob for the qualification. A couple of those fish just didn't look quite right for pure CNBG - but I would have never questioned the Boss ... 
N.E. Texas 2 acre and 1/4 acre ponds
Original george #173 (22 June 2002)
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
