|
Forums36
Topics41,009
Posts558,468
Members18,528
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
10 members (Boondoggle, rjackson, Theo Gallus, Sunil, Lina, Bigtrh24, Brett B, liquidsquid, Dave Davidson1, anthropic),
938
guests, and
386
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8
Fingerling
|
OP
Fingerling
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8 |
My pond is down about 6 FT. The bull rushes are all along the bank but about 3 ft. from the water. Can I use round-up on the Bull Rushes as long as I do not get it in the water?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 95
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 95 |
In my opinion, rushes around the pond shoreline are beneficial. We consider them non-invasive and useful for filtering silt and nutrients before the water makes it to the pond.
If you treat shoreline/ripirian vegetation, you're removing the naturally occuring filter to your pond. If I woke up in your shoes this morning, I'd leave the rushes alone...they'll do you more good than harm.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8
Fingerling
|
|
OP
Fingerling
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8 |
Thanks Trent. My house sits 50 ft. from the lake. I was only talking about taking the bull rushes out along the 200 feet along the back of the house. The rest of pond will not be touched. But thanks again, had not consider the benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 115
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 115 |
darwin7 see the following link. Bull Rush Removal It worked for me with just regular RoundUp.
Its not how well you do something,
Its how well you look doing it!
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
