Forums36
Topics40,899
Posts557,051
Members18,451
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
2 members (Rainman, Bobbss),
458
guests, and
152
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 11
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 11 |
I’ve got a 10 acre pond in SE Nebraska that holds lots of fish. It has LM bass, Bluegill and Channel Catfish. The pond is slightly overpopulated with bass, and I’m in year 2 of culling 200 bass (14” and smaller, yearly), and seeing good results. The Bluegill population is very abundant and most catches are 6-9”. My question: Do you think it’d be wise to add some hybrid BG to the pond. I’ve caught some 10” BG here, and would like to catch more huge Bluegill with the fly rod.
Any insight is appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,213 Likes: 512
|
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,213 Likes: 512 |
May sound strange but how about dropping cull rate of LMB by 25-50 to eat more bluegill so the number that make it through predation have more room to grow.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,938 Likes: 268
Moderator Lunker
|
Moderator Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,938 Likes: 268 |
With the number of HBG most people can afford to add to a pond with an established BG population, it would be hard to notice a difference.
"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever." -S. M. Stirling
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,474 Likes: 264
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,474 Likes: 264 |
Agree with Theo. A few HBG will not make a difference. Due to their aggressiveness you will likely catch them out if they are not eaten first .
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|