Pond Boss Magazine
https://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
victortechy, fishengelbert, Woody Jones, Joe7328, Reno Guerra
18,475 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums36
Topics40,938
Posts557,717
Members18,476
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
Top Posters
esshup 28,493
ewest 21,489
Cecil Baird1 20,043
Bill Cody 15,134
Who's Online Now
3 members (simon, Boondoggle, Freunb02), 703 guests, and 340 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 3
OP Offline
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 3
Hey everyone,

So as some of you know I stocked my bass in June 2017 and there first year in the pond they where growing great and looking like pigs, as you can see from the photo below which was taken last December. Well this month I did a sampling and they are way skinnier, some even with sunken bellys. Why is this? is this normal for Juvenal bass to lose weight going on there teenage years before they become mature fish? All the CNBG are doing great due to a feeding program and the adults are hand size and bigger, though few of them spawned shallow, most spawned in 8ft of water. I didnt have a giant spawn of CNBG but it was pretty good. The main forage in the pond is CNBG and minnows along the bank.I have now grass in the pond only hard structure like pallets, logs, and some sunken christmas trees. What do you think I can do to start getting weight back on my bass? feel free to ask any question to get a better back ground.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 545
S
Offline
S
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 545
I can't imagine what is taking place to go from THAT to skinny...unless they ran out of suitable size forage. By the way you talk, that doesn't seem to be the issue unless there are just WAY too many in that same size group.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Get some WR measurements and report back. Per Kenny underperforming LMB typically due to lack of appropriate forage size - you can help the forage base by installing some dense shallow cover to help escape predation or cull low WR LMB or both.


Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau

[Linked Image from i1261.photobucket.com]


Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 545
S
Offline
S
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 545
" I didnt have a giant spawn of CNBG but it was pretty good."

I misread this part.. I read it as you DID have a giant spawn..If it was just "ok", probably lack sufficient numbers of forage. Agree whole-heartedly with TJ, need some dense cover to protect larger numbers for higher recruitment and it may be such now that you will need to remove some of those bass. This is the hard part of "playing catch-up".. Got to get CNBG recruitment back up to support LMB growth. Now that I've typed that, depending on WR of present fish, it may be best to plan on pulling some bass out because you can't make up for lost efficiency/lack of forage, you never achieve maximum total growth potential. The chain on this year class has been broken to some extent. Reporting WR of current LMB will be very important in determining the next step.

Last edited by Snipe; 12/31/18 08:01 PM.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
I'm thinking the lack of abundant edible sized forage is cause for lower WR as skinnier bass. The skinnier bass should also not have grown a lot in length - correct? How many bass have you collected for your sample? It is possible you are sampling slow growing males?

Likely the plump bass basically ate all the abundant preferred sizes of forage in the lower structure habitat. Fast growing bass 'cleaned up' on the main initial crop of forage items. This is a common problem in new ponds; fast initial growth, then a noticeable slow down. Now, many of the CNBC are too big to eat and remaining forage is too small of sizes to allow higher body weights and continued fast growth of the LMB.

For followers of your project refer us back to you original post with the link for your baseline information.

Last edited by Bill Cody; 01/01/19 03:42 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 28
F
Offline
F
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 28
So what should he do Mr. Cody? Others are in this same situation.


Dear Alcohol, We had a deal where you would make me funnier, smarter, and a better dancer... I saw the video... We need to talk.
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 57
T
Offline
T
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 57
Originally Posted By: teehjaeh57
Get some WR measurements and report back. Per Kenny underperforming LMB typically due to lack of appropriate forage size - you can help the forage base by installing some dense shallow cover to help escape predation or cull low WR LMB or both.



This helped me year before last when my pond was two yrs old. An E survey in March showed few bg in the 2 to 3" range. It was suggested to me to add shoreline cover because I did not have any vegetation and we added 25 lbs of fhm's tp take some of the pressure off the cnbg fry. And then the first of June I had lots and lots of cnbg in the desired size. I am planning on replicating the same thing this year.


Do not judge me by the politicians in my City, State or Federal Government.


Tracy
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 281
J
Offline
J
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 281
Originally Posted By: Dinsmoreoutdoors
Hey everyone,

. . . All the CNBG are doing great due to a feeding program and the adults are hand size and bigger, though few of them spawned shallow, most spawned in 8ft of water. I didnt have a giant spawn of CNBG but it was pretty good. The main forage in the pond is CNBG and minnows along the bank.I have now grass in the pond only hard structure like pallets, logs, and some sunken christmas trees. What do you think I can do to start getting weight back on my bass? feel free to ask any question to get a better back ground.


It sounds like your BOW is at carrying capacity and filled with CNBG that are too large for your initial stockers to eat. You have some choices but you must make the BOW more amenable to the production of 0 year CNBG.


1. Create space for CNBG YOY. This can be done by harvesting large CNBG. You can also add more structure which will increase habitat and food for young BG with the benefit of providing cover for them.

2. Increase fertility (fertilization or feed). Just another way make more space for the BG. Just keep in mind that this capacity will be filled quickly and predominantly consumed by larger CNBG.

3. Diversify the food chain to use unconverted primary production. TP and TFS are possible additions. This doesn't make more space for BG but they should contribute more forage than the CNBG forage you sacrifice.

4. Reduce competition among the LMB. Harvest is your only option that will reduce competition. You haven't stated your goal with regard to the LMB or what the ultimate sustainable objective will be.

I think the fastest way to get back on track is a combination of CNBG harvest and LMB culling which should be focused on male LMB. I say fastest because the reduced competition will be immediate and the CNBG will respond by spawning just as soon as the space is available and temperatures are sufficient. So, I think you should be doing these fishing efforts now so that you will get the benefit of the full growing season next year.


It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
I would not harvest your largest BG - I'd preserve them for angling diversity...other recommendations are sound.


Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau

[Linked Image from i1261.photobucket.com]


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
Suggestions above for improving RW of the now skinny LMB are sound. Reread and affirm them. Corrections or solutions to thin bodied bass (predators) have been talked about a lot in past posts. I do not recall the specifics of dinsmoreoutdoors' initial pond stocking which is important to fixing his 'problem' and why I did not provide a lot of details.

General advice. Firstly make sure of or reaffirm the fishery goals. When you have too many slow growing thin bodied predators and you want fast growing, bigger predators the most obvious fix is reduce the predator numbers, then work on improving forage numbers and maintaining adequate numbers of all proper sizes of forage based on the predator size structure population desired.

It is not a good idea to money whip it by just adding more forage. It is a good idea to read the recent PB article Nov-Dec 2018 pg 28 by D.Beasley: "Thinking Past the Obvious". In the article he tells us to know the cause and effect of the problem "manage the entire ecosystem" for getting at the real fix.

I would add quite a bit dense cover habitat that can be removed when needed to achieve fewer forage and better RW. Ideal amount of dense shoreline cover, edge to 6ft deep, is supposed to be 20%-25% of the shoreline length which is one whole shoreline of a square pond. Keep in mind most tree branch twigs quickly decompose in 1-2-3 yrs. Also keep in mind that the dense cover will also allow good survival of YOY bass which will happen in 2018!.

If one is really serious about growing premium sport fish you should have some sort of forage pond without predators to mitigate unforeseen shortages of forages to keep the predators growing while your adjust predator density.

Last edited by Bill Cody; 01/01/19 04:30 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 281
J
Offline
J
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 281
The situation is currently a crisis if dinsmoreoutdoors wants large LMB. Without immediate intervention, it will be a trophy BG BOW and be in a situation where the LMB are vastly overpopulated. Knowing nothing about the initial stocking, I have to wonder if he might have stocked more than 100 LMB/acre initially.


It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
I looked back at Dinsmore's pre-bass stocking situation:
Quote:

""The pond is 1acre and has only FHM, CNBG, and 3 dozen shiners. The CNBG where stocked in Dec and there are 18 adult CNBG and the FHM have been in over a year. There are thousands of new CNBG and FHM hacthlings from this year all over the pond. Plan on ordering 80 bass thinking I should have 50 or so make it to next year. Do ya have any advice to give on introducing new 2.5 inch bass fingerlings to a new pond?"" Bass stocking was ""So Wednesday I got my order from Suttles fish farm for 80 large mouth bass!! they are around 2- 2.5" and where in great shape! they where jumping all in the bag wanting to get into there new home. They are pellet trained so I released them by my feeder hoping some will be near by to know when it goes off and get some food. Since I have a daily feeding program for all my forage fish, im hoping that my bass will be a lil over a pound this time next year!""

In his pond with "thousands of new CNBG & FHM it is pretty obvious most of those 80 LMB survived. Now he will have to deal with a new crop of LMB in this spring's spawn which will be happening soon in Florida.

Since the stocker bass were pellet trained and if he is still pellet feeding the fish, there should still be some plump pellet eating bass present. If bass are eating pellets, I wonder if he has tried the Aquamax or similar brand of bass pellets to maintain bass body weight?

Last edited by Bill Cody; 01/01/19 04:22 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 281
J
Offline
J
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 281
Thanks Bill, that provides a lot of additional context. There was a large crop of CNBG YOY last year when the LMB were stocked and this year CNBG YOY production is way down. Last year survivors of CNBG grew very well but there must be a great many of last years CNBG surviving that are >6" long. I think a change of food is a good idea but now more than before I think I would try to remove 50-100 lbs/acre of the 6 to 8 in bluegill.


Last edited by jpsdad; 01/01/19 05:03 PM.

It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers


Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,309
Likes: 300
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,309
Likes: 300
I know squat about feed trained LMB, but as they grow, shouldn't the fish food volume be increased accordingly? If not, won't they decline the same as if they were feeding on natural forage? LMB sharing pellets with a booming CNBG population could easily spread calories way too thin for both species.

Maybe feeder watching, and determining what the primary diet of the LMB would be an easy starting point. Trying Bill's Aquamax LMB food suggestion would be my first stab at this.


Also, I've never raised LMB in my hatchery pond, that despite huge hand stocked forage bases, didn't still have both runts and super stars. I wouldn't think ponds aren't any different.

Last edited by FireIsHot; 01/01/19 05:55 PM.

AL

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
The pond does need adult CNBG for spawning especially since this spring's crop in the shallows "had a few spawners". Maybe removing a significant number of largest CNBG is not wise? The cause for lack of lots of YOY CNBG should be investigated and corrected for the 2019 spawn. He should determine about what percentage of LMB are eating or trying to eat pellets.

I trust he is working to get us some RW (WR) values and a picture of a couple of the thin bodied bass so readers can learn from his project. This is a classic example of growth "hitting the wall" for new stocker bass.

He should be cautious in his smaller pond (1ac) and angling as to minimize creating hook smart bass. How to do that I am not real sure. One idea would be to fish for short periods a week or two apart, remove every bass caught until a target is achieved then,,, throw that particular and color lure away!

Last edited by Bill Cody; 01/01/19 08:09 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
I wonder if removing the larger class BG could result in earlier sexual maturity and spawning of the more numerous next smaller class BG? Could this result in an actual increase in the small BG population over what the current large BG produce?

Last edited by Bill Cody; 01/01/19 08:51 PM.

[Linked Image]
Be Brave Enough to Suck at Something New!
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
Would prolific tilapia be a benefit? They will live year round in FL which would have pros and cons.


aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 281
J
Offline
J
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 281
Originally Posted By: Bill D.
I wonder if removing the larger class BG could result in earlier sexual maturity and spawning of the more numerous next smaller class BG? Could this result in an actual increase in the small BG population over what the current large BG produce?


I think this is likely.

Just something to think about. It isn't a static situation. Its not the standing weight that is feeding the LMB. It is the production. If a BOW is at carrying capacity for BG and there is little mortality of the older BG then there will be very little production of YOY BG. Swingle noted that when BG prey isn't in good supply the male BG consume the eggs and spawns fail. On the other hand if the carrying capacity exceeds the standing weight considerably, the BG will breed prolifically and fry survival is improved (due to reduced BG competition and BG predation of fry). If LMB are cropping these YOY as they reach 2" then the BG can produce multiple crops/spawns because the space for the YOY remains available.


It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Good point Al and Bill - high quality LMB feed is critical to LMB growth [Skretting and Optimal are two I use regularly with success], and as the fish grow supplemental feedings will need to increase or expect more pressure on the forage base.


Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau

[Linked Image from i1261.photobucket.com]


Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 545
S
Offline
S
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 545
I can see removing a few dozen of the largest CNBG but ultimately I believe you need more dense habitat in that 1-5' range. I also don't want to beat a dead horse either but not "seeing" your pond or having an idea as to how much dense structure you have now, I think we need to be careful of removing ANY fish until the actual problem is found.
If the carrying capacity of the pond has been reached in it's current state then adding any other fish makes no sense to me. What DOES make sense is to find out how much shallow, dense habitat we have?

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Agree.

For the record, in a small BOW like this I'd recommend 25-35 LMB/acre if goal was trophy LMB, maybe up to 50/acre for SMB. Per Cody, watch the angling pressure, hookshy fish are a reality.


Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau

[Linked Image from i1261.photobucket.com]


Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 57
T
Offline
T
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 57
Originally Posted By: TGW1
Originally Posted By: teehjaeh57
Get some WR measurements and report back. Per Kenny underperforming LMB typically due to lack of appropriate forage size - you can help the forage base by installing some dense shallow cover to help escape predation or cull low WR LMB or both.



This helped me year before last when my pond was two yrs old. An E survey in March showed few bg in the 2 to 3" range. It was suggested to me to add shoreline cover because I did not have any vegetation and we added 25 lbs of fhm's tp take some of the pressure off the cnbg fry. And then the first of June I had lots and lots of cnbg in the desired size. I am planning on replicating the same thing this year.


I forgot to mention we removed 50-7" cnbg as we added the shoreline cover. The were not the largest cnbg in the pond but the pond had a lot of cnbg in that size range.


Do not judge me by the politicians in my City, State or Federal Government.


Tracy
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 265
E
Moderator
Hall of Fame 2014
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Hall of Fame 2014
Lunker
E
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 265
If the pond is at carrying capacity (most new ponds reach CC in 18-24 mths) after stocking then you manage what is there. That can take many methods including stocking to replace extra harvested fish, extra harvest of different sizes , population adjustment and more.
















Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 99
Editor, Pond Boss Magazine
Lunker
Offline
Editor, Pond Boss Magazine
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 99
Dinsmooreoutdoors, I'd chime in here, but before so, offer more data. Give us lengths and weights of at least 30 bass.

Tell us about your feeding program, since you stocked feed-trained fish. That photo suggests a well-fed bass that eats fish food and abundant amounts of forage fish. Which feed are you using, how much and how often?

What's the habitat like? What percentage of your pond has structure and cover? What types?

This will help these guys offer good advice. One photo and a brief description only leads to speculation.


Teach a man to grow fish...
He can teach to catch fish...
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
Where is Dinsmore out catchin fish while we 'thrash' this?
I wonder if it is practical for him to sample 30 bass in his one acre? Plus this could put a significant risk for making hook smart bass plus what hook shyness they already have developed.

If all the 80 stocker bass survived then collecting 30 is 37% of the population and if 50 of the 80 stockers survived, collecting 30 is 60% of the population. Are there any statisticians out there? How many of 80 are needed to get a good (significiant) sample?

Al Gore's internet is amazing - LOL.
I went to a metrics sampling website and found:
If we sample 30 as suggested by Lusk then we get a 14% sampling error.
If we have a population of 80 bass and we sample 10 bass then at the 95% confidence level there is 29% error of our evaluation.
If we have a population of 80 and sample 5 bass we get a 42% error at the 95% confidence accuracy level.


If we have only 50 bass and sample 5 we get a 42% error.

Reference used, however there are other sites.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size-calculator/

Last edited by Bill Cody; 01/02/19 02:41 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
For readers of this thread here are some very good sage bass growing advice and wisdom from The Pond Boss Bob Lusk that also aptly applies to this Dinsmore thread. This Dinsmore thread likely simulated Lusk to add this lengthy post below in the link above. His advice is very pertinent to Dinsmore’s bass problem and a VERY GOOD LESSON for new pond owners wanting LMB. Also remember these are southern US waters that have faster LMB growth and multiple spawns of BG.
Keep in mind Lusk’s advice is for a 50 acre lake so divide his numbers of 50 for Dinsmore’s 1 acre pond. Both waters are in Florida.
Quotes from Lusk are from this thread, but the info is basic to growing bigger LMB:
http://forums.pondboss.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=500229#Post500229

Quote:
Lusk - “At 500FHM for a year and BG 500 per acre, that's a good number to establish a significant food chain over a year. The fatheads will reproduce exponentially during the pre-bass year.
Then when you stock those 60 bass per acre, they will grow so fast you'll be stunned.
If the lake does as we all hope, you'll see tens of thousands of fathead minnows, ranging in size from newly hatched fish up to adults. When those 3,000 (60/ac) bass are stocked, numerical odds of their demise is small, a fraction of a percent. If you stock 3 inch fish in May 2020, they'll be six inches mid-July. They'll average 12" by late September, and by November will range from 8" up to two pounds...the fastest growers.
You'll have some fish big enough to spawn by 2021. The bluegills won't grow nearly as large, except around the two feeders. The bluegills will mostly mature sexually at 3-4" and begin to spawn. People think those bluegills will grow large, but they won't, as a population. They'll start spawning within a few weeks.
I think the risk of bass being eaten, and limited bass recruitment is low in your part of the planet.
But...I can be wrong... If you get into Year 3 and aren't seeing bass recruitment, buy more baby bass of great genetics and create your own missing year class. That's not a bad thing, either. It just costs some money.””

LUSK- “”Here's another fisheries lesson, guys. Listen up.

When a lake is properly stocked in the beginning, with a sound strategy, the results are normally predictable. Nature can always derail the best laid plan with weather, too much plant life, and invasion of predators, a bad algae bloom...there's along list.

But, aside from unpredictable derailments, here's what to expect from scampbell's stocking plan for 50 ac. Let's dissect it and I'll share what to expect from it, broken down into five years.

Year One, forage fish are stocked. 24,000 fathead minnows and 24,000 bluegills. That's about 3-4 pounds of fatheads per acre. In the first six months, with fertility in the water and plenty of spawning substrate, the lake will product about 15 pounds per acre. It should max out around 40-60 pounds of fatheads per acre and sustain there as carrying capacity dictates. As that happens, some of those small bluegills will grow to 3-4", stop growing and focus on reproduction. That will take about two months. At that point, you'll see quite a few spawning beds with anywhere from 20-200 little craters of small bluegills reproducing. When the babies come off the nest, they'll compete with fathead minnows, and eat some small minnows. The bluegills will spawn in cycles, most of the summer. Within those same six months there'll be a sharp increase in tiny bluegills and overall growth rates of bluegills will level off. Around the feeders, some of the bluegills will push well beyond six inches that first year. Those will become the dominant spawners by fall. As the first year progresses, I would expect a food chain of 100-150 pounds per acre to develop. Then, when bass fingerlings are stocked at the beginning of Year Two, here's what to expect.

Bass will grow extremely fast. Fingerling bass, 2-3" in size, will find tens of thousands of tiny fathead minnnows and small bluegills. Bass that size will feed primarily on small fatheads and insects. Insects will proliferate due to healthy water and abundant fish to eat as well. Bass will go from 2-3" to 6" within six weeks. At that point, their sizes will begin to differentiate. The most aggressive, fastest growing, mostly females, will shoot to 8-10" over the next two to three weeks. By fall, the slowest growing bass will be around 8" and the best of the best will be at least two pounds, maybe bigger. Fathead minnow numbers will begin to decline measurably by fall, and bluegill numbers will continue to rise. Bass poundage will be around 20-35 pounds per acre (in theory), and the food chain will still be high. Productivity of the food chain dynamics will change. As forage fish are being eaten and converted to bass, survival rates of newly hatched fish will rise. The dynamics of that function will shift, base on how productive the water is. That medium will dictate production. In the phosphate pits, productivity stays high. Jay, Florida, has some productive soils around it, which influence nearby waters. That region of Florida is famous for productivity. So, if the water can motivate continuing spawning of forage fish, here's what to expect.

As bass grow, bluegill sizes will increase. Bigger bluegills will dominate the spawning beds, and more babies will be cranked out. When bass mass reaches around 50-60 pounds per acre, the forage fish will be approaching maintenance level. At that point, in Year Three, the biggest bluegills will be 8-9", and those originally stocked bass will range from 10" to six pounds. Of those originally stocked bass, half are boys, and will top out around 14-16". The other half, the females, expect 20-30% to be the biggest, 30-40% to be "average", and the rest to be under-performers, passive, slow-growers.

Here's where it gets fun. In Year Three, expect those biggest bass, which are now a year old, to reproduce. So, the biggest females will dominate reproduction, which is a good thing. The concern stated above is that there could be so many bluegill eating baby bass as they come off the nest, that recruitment of bass in Year Three could be a problem. That's a problem I'd welcome. That means the lake still has lots of forage fish. If recruitment is inhibited, stock 2,000 bass fingerlings and you've bought the recruitment for the second age class of bass. But, my bet is that enough baby bass would survive the onslaught of bluegills to add that second year class. Electrofish to be sure.

During Year Three, the lake's carrying capacity for bass will begin reaching max. That's when we start looking at culling. More on that in a minute. In Year Three, we expect reproduction and those baby bass fuel the need for culling. So, if bass don't recruit well in Year Three, we can push back culling until Year Four. In the meantime, we now have 6-8 size classes of bluegills, two sizes of those are the primary broodfish/spawners for the entire lake. In the other 4-6 size classes of bluegills, we expect those to grow as fast as possible, with 80-90% being eaten within the first 90 days of their lives. The remaining number of fish of each spawn will dwindle over the next 90 days...as the brood fish are showering the lake with new babies to take the place of those who gave it up for bass to grow.
As all this is occurring, threadin shad are establishing themselves in the open water and beginning to affect bass behavior. As schools of shad push into 2-3" and then 3-4" size classes, intermediate-sized bass will begin to alter their behavior and shift from exclusively littoral inhabitants into part time chasers of shad in open water. That behavior will influence bluegill behavior. Bluegills will feed more aggressively and not always have to retreat to safety in lieu of feeding. Again, productivity of the water will influence these factors as well. By the end of Year Three the best of the best bass from the originally stocked group will be 6-7 pounds, maybe one or two bigger. By now, those originally stocked bass will fundamentally be three size classes. The best of the best for that lake will be excitingly huge and pretty hard to catch. That's probably going to be 150 of the originally stocked fish, in the best habitat for fish that size. The next size class will be 3-5 pounds, and numbers will be around 150-200 of those. Considering attrition, the remaining bass will range from 1-3 pounds and will number 1,000-1,500 and average around pound to slightly under two pounds. Attrition comes as the best of the best grow larger and mouth gape increases. When that happens in this scenario, those slow-growing bass become food. Those 6-7 pound bass are now making their primary living off big bluegills and those slow-growing bass. If anyone takes time to do the math, these numbers are now somewhere between 50-75 pounds of bass per acre, which is the amount nature sustains, depending on how fertile and productive the water is at any given time. One other important factor here is the dynamics of the food chain. During the course of the second, third, and fourth years, if we had a way to measure productivity, we'd see a lake as this producing something around 300-600 pounds of forage fish per acre, per year. But, the standing crop would rarely exceed 150 pounds per acre on any given day. That's why it's so important to keep the predator/prey relationships as close to "balance" as possible. When the predators overwhelm their prey, productivity of forage fish plummets and carrying capacity for prey becomes dominated by how many mouths there are to eat a baby fish right off the nest.

In Year Four, barring any of those natural influencers we can't necessarily predict, expect major changes in the fishery. Now, you have a significant mass of bass beyond 17". And, they've spawned. Now, you have an unpredictable number of baby bass decimating the food chain at a lower level. They're eating young bluegills, crawfish, insects, each other, and snakes, snails, and puppy dog tails...whatever dares enter the water. Time to cull. Set your limits based on lengths and weights of your bass. Now is the time to be vigilant about culling. For a 50 acre lake, expect to cull 1,000-1500 small bass per year. That's work. For the remaining fishery, the biggest bass have all they can eat, zeroing in on 8-12" bass and large bluegills for dinner. Or, breakfast, or lunch, or snacks. Threadfins are thriving, but their numbers will dwindle during cool months as intermediate-sized bass feed on them heavily. Your biggest bass are knocking on the door of double-digit sizes, and maybe four or five across the lake will hit that magic size in Year Four. During this year, expect forage fish numbers to drop due to heavy pressure from young bass. Catch rates will rise, and anglers will be catching lots of 10-14" bass, with good numbers of 3-5 pounders, a rare 6-8, and maybe a 9. Bluegills will be knocking on the door of 10-11", well beyond a pound, some maybe 1.5 pounds, if the feeding program is consistent.

Year Five shows the best potential for young double-digit bass, maybe 10-15 of those across the lake. Bluegills can be over two pounds, with lots of bluegills in the 4-6" size class, if bass culling has been consistent. For the next three years, this lake has a great shot at some huge bass, with fun fishing, catching good numbers of 4-6 pounders with some 8's and an occasional huge fish.

Now, all this is influenced by hurricanes, droughts, flocks of cormorants and pelicans, freezing weather which eradicates threadfin shad, and otters. It's also influenced by quality and quantity of habitat in the lake, as that gives different sizes of different species of fish what they need to thrive. Productivity of the water will be a great influencer as well. Volume and species of plants influence a fishery, too.

It wasn't my intent to write an essay about this stuff, but I see some earnest questions and thoughtful insight.


Last edited by Bill Cody; 01/02/19 03:25 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,794
Likes: 68
Gold!


Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau

[Linked Image from i1261.photobucket.com]


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 99
Editor, Pond Boss Magazine
Lunker
Offline
Editor, Pond Boss Magazine
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 99
The reason I'm telling Dinsmore to weigh and measure 30 bass is simple. Doesn't really have much to do with statistics. Feed-trained bass are bred to be aggressive. So, if 30 fish have Wr of <90%, my advice would be one thing. If 15 are Wr >90, and 15 are <90, I'll tell him something else. If 4 look terrible and 26 are obese, I'd tell him different. Those lengths and weights well tell us if he has a "food" problem, a prey problem, or a fish behavioral problem.

For example, I've seen feed-trained bass growth level off when a feed budget levels off. When a guy sets a limit on fish food, dominance at the feeder defines relative weights of a sample of the fish, not necessarily the natural food chain.

If all his fish relative weights are down, then he has food chain problem, and the solution is different.


Teach a man to grow fish...
He can teach to catch fish...
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 486
There you go, now we know why a larger sample can be the most beneficial type of sample. "It all depends".


aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 545
S
Offline
S
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 545
If I may add to Mr. Lusk's thoughts, The Gent I work under in my home state here is a firm believer in a "hard" sample. Too many factors can cause good and/or bad samples, so in his mind (and mine), it's best to get as good of a representation of the population as possible.
Our Walleye egg-take is a great example of this. We're gathering for other purposes but the over-all sample really gives the best data of average conditions present, whereas a bad night of fall samples can be extremely misleading, hence the reason we give a good hard effort for 10-12 days/nights.
Makes good logical sense.
EDIT: Sorry Mr. Cody, I type too slow.

Last edited by Snipe; 01/02/19 08:01 PM.
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 3
OP Offline
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 3
Man this post blew up while I have been gone! Sorry for the lack of info or reply to this but I was recalled to active duty in the military and was deployed. I will be back home late September, and with the money I have saved I will be making some upgrades to the pond which I am hoping will improve it alot. I will be adding 10X10 spawning areas for my CNBG with pea gravel bottom, aeration system with diffusers, adding more brush piles around the pond in 3-4ft of water with larger brush piles close to CNBG spawning site made from cedar branches, and last I will be removing atleast a dozen LMB that are in the 8-12" range the I see in wolf packs that circle the pond feeding on the 11/2"-2" YOY CNBG. I will be making videos of these improvements and and the progress of the results.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
1 member likes this: Augie
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 184
P
Offline
P
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 184
Good luck on the culling and THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE! Hope to hear more from you on pond

Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 461
Likes: 16
C
Offline
C
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 461
Likes: 16
Glad you are coming home safely!


Im going to ask a lot of questions, but only because I'm clueless


5-20 Acres in Florida. Bass/Tilapia/Bowfin/Gator
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 107
R
Offline
R
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 107
Cant think you enough for your service. Hopefully your place can give you a place of peace.


The people who say I can't do it can just sit the @^#% down and watch me. Friends call me Rusto I also subscribe to pond boss mag. http://forums.pondboss.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=504716#Post504716
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 895
Likes: 201
G
Offline
G
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 895
Likes: 201
Thank You for your service and good luck with your pond, or your happy place as I like to call mine!


All the really good ideas I've ever had came to me while I was milking a cow.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Today's Birthdays
Ralph D Hart
Recent Posts
Hi there quick question on going forward
by Joe7328 - 04/16/24 02:35 PM
Braggin Time
by Lake8 - 04/16/24 02:21 PM
What did you do at your pond today?
by FishinRod - 04/16/24 01:49 PM
'Nother New Guy
by FishinRod - 04/16/24 01:42 PM
aeration pump type?
by Theo Gallus - 04/16/24 10:19 AM
Golden Shiners - What size to stock?
by Theeck - 04/16/24 09:49 AM
How to catch Hybrid Striper
by FireIsHot - 04/16/24 09:45 AM
instant email notifications of post replies ?
by Augie - 04/16/24 09:31 AM
fishing tackle and tackle room
by FireIsHot - 04/16/24 08:30 AM
Compaction Question
by teehjaeh57 - 04/15/24 11:54 PM
What type of fry?
by Sunil - 04/15/24 08:58 PM
Group Text of Customers, Pay to Fish
by Fishingadventure - 04/15/24 04:24 PM
Newly Uploaded Images
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
by Tbar, December 10
Deer at Theo's 2023
Deer at Theo's 2023
by Theo Gallus, November 13
Minnow identification
Minnow identification
by Mike Troyer, October 6
Sharing the Food
Sharing the Food
by FishinRod, September 9
Nice BGxRES
Nice BGxRES
by Theo Gallus, July 28
Snake Identification
Snake Identification
by Rangersedge, July 12

� 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5