Forums36
Topics40,964
Posts558,011
Members18,506
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
14 members (Sunil, Shorthose, rjackson, Bobbss, Jason D, John Folchetti, Lake8, JoshMI, LeighAnn, FishinRod, canyoncreek, Drago, Boondoggle, highflyer),
1,284
guests, and
182
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 13
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 13 |
I inherited a 1/4-acre, 10' deep pond in Northern California with a 25' tall willow tree on the shore of the embankment. To remove the tree without producing leaks, I plan to trench down the middle of the embankment with a Ditch Witch to sever the roots growing toward the exterior slope this year, refill the trench and wait a few years for those roots to decay harmlessly, then remove the tree itself.
Has anyone tried this? I wonder whether I need to put a root barrier in the trench.
T. Gray Shaw ISA Certified Arborist # WE-1037 Redway and Berkeley, CA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,712 Likes: 3
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,712 Likes: 3 |
From your description, I'm not sure if this is on a man-made dam, or if it is on the edge of an excavated shoreline.
For most deciduous trees, the roots mirror the canopy, at least in size. There are also hundreds of willow tree species in North America. Most are water loving. Their roots will seek out wetness. But, not all are created equal.
Twenty-five foot tall doesn't sound too bad either. If it was on an excavated bank, I'd just take it down. If it was on a man-made dam or levy, then I think I'd take a similar approach to what you suggested. I'd cut the roots as deep as possible. I'd get rid of the tree now, and pull the stump. If I did that, I'd keep after the "suckers" that will inevitably sprout.
Good luck, Ken
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|