|
Forums36
Topics41,004
Posts558,404
Members18,524
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,721
Lunker
|
OP
Lunker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,721 |
I watch bill dance on t.v. and he just stated that a study had been completed showing that bass preferred crayfish over bluegill and that they gained weight faster eating the crayfish.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
|
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
Interesting... I'd love to see the study.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 78
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 78 |
Crayfish are very high in protein and are much easier to catch than bluegill. I would not be suprised.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 89
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 89 |
Yeah but they are double tough to get established.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
|
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
I think with the right habitat(rocky area) and stocking them prior to the introduction of bass, catfish etc. I think crayfish take hold pretty easy. Stocking them into an established pond with no or little habitat is about as effective as stocking FHM in the same situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 14
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 14 |
I would think if the habitat is there, they will find a way to take hold even if you don't stock them.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
