Forums36
Topics40,965
Posts558,013
Members18,506
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
12 members (Sunil, JoshMI, gautprod, Jason D, Theo Gallus, Shorthose, rjackson, Bobbss, John Folchetti, Lake8, LeighAnn, FishinRod),
1,233
guests, and
180
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 115
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 115 |
I have heard of people putting in one or two types of minnows but what about combining multiple species in large numbers. Would this give each species a better advantage at survival? (Mainly for bass existing ponds). So instead of 50lbs of fatheads have 10lbs of each: Fatheads, Threadfins, Common/Golden Shiners, Creek Chub, even Talapia, etc... all at once.
Would the added diversity of species allow for better survival for the bait fish because not all the baitfish inhabit the same forage places of the bass? Thus not giving bass a single species target?
Also as nature takes its course, the survival of the fittest comes into play as to which species will be able to thrive best.
Thoughts? Experiences?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365 |
I don't have a clue. Or do I? I think I can come up with a strong hint. Look at any "natural" older body of water, and you will find many more species of forage fish in the food chain than a recreational pond. However, a great fishing natural lake is not necessarily as good or as desirable as a great fishing recreational pond.
Having worked with statistics for 35 years, I would think 4 or 5 species of forage fish would increase the chances for any 1 of them to succeed in finding a niche in the pond's ecosystem. You know, finding cover, food, and reproducing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,075
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,075 |
3z3k3l,
Personally, I've changed my view on this. I used to think that my ponds would only ever have BG and LMB, period...but diversity has definite advantages. It seems to me, that within reason, we can find find complementary fish and in that case diversity is good. Fish which do not complement are not necessarily good.
For example, for weed and algae control, grass carp and Tilapia complement each other very well.
For small forage, I also think fatheads, shad, and even gambusia complement each other as forage providers...maybe not so much Gambusia, but I have no choice on them.
For larger forage, BG, redear, and Tilapia seem to complement each other, especially since the Tilapia die off each winter before they can become a problem to BG fry.
Predators can be complementary also. I believe that LMB and HSB may be complimentary. Not sure yet, because I haven't had enough personal experience but it appears that HSB take the open water and LMB take the structure and shallower water each finding their own forage.
Catfish, crappie, common carp are examples of species which do not complement the above mix. Some say gizzard shad shoulkd also be in that list, but I have them and so far so good.
I've totally changed my view on fish....diversity when complementary, is a good thing, IMHO. Besides, its just more fun.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|