Pond Boss
Posted By: DavidBiss Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 01:14 PM
I built a new 2 acre pond Fall of 2012, by Fall of 2013 my pond was about 1/2 full. A nearby friend has a couple ponds on his lands and he started an active harvesting program pulling out any LMB under 14". Through the Fall, I moved 75 bass between 10 - 14" into my pond. From seining a pond he has I added about 300 bluegill in October. In January of 2014 I added 15 lbs of minnows, 2500 1-3" coppernose, 600 3-4" copernose and 500 redear. In February, I moved 15 more 12-14" LMB into the pond.

I would appreciate any thoughts as to if I need to add more bait fish, and should I stop adding LMB.

thanks
Posted By: Yolk Sac Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 01:28 PM
Good morning, and welcome to Pond Boss.

I think the title of your post says it all.....nicely done.

Lots of experts will chime in, but a couple thoughts:

1] No more LMB. You're going to have a huge spawn this spring and you'll be up to your eyeballs in greencarp before you know it.

2] Don't waste your money on any type of minnow, or any forage fish other than BG >6" in size. Anything smaller, and just about any fusiform forage such as shiners, is just going to be expensive fish food.

3] Look in the archives for threads about LMB heavy ponds, there's a lot in there.

4] Don't despair-most pond missteps can be fixed with persistance and elbow grease. Get an ultralight, and remove every small bass you catch for the next couple years.

And of course should have asked for your goals. If you're shooting for nothing but big bream, you may be on the right track....balanced fishery or trophy LMB, may take some rebalancing.

Again, welcome.

Posted By: RER Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 01:29 PM
what did the initial 75 bass have to eat?

they probably were very hungry and ate just about every thing you added after them, Most notably the 1-4" CNBG and Redear.

If they did not get them the next 15 LMB did.

You might have to continue stocking adult sunfish to get them established and your minnows are probably toast.

this is just my novice point of view, I'll let the experts give you some real suggestions.
Posted By: DavidBiss Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 02:01 PM
My goal is to build big bass - pure and simple -

Will be adding Tilapia later this spring to clear algea and get more forage fish in there -

So pull Bass out? - I had read some time ago to add about 200 fingerlings , so I thought adding 75-100 12-14" would be good - guess not
Posted By: RER Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 02:32 PM
unless you add very large tilapia they wil get eaten, I believe
Posted By: Bill Cody Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 02:39 PM
Okay - you are in TX so your fish will eat a reasonable amount of fish in cool weather Dec-Mar compared to northern LMB in ice covered ponds. Now for some homework and fishery science.

I calculate you are way too light on forage. IMO you shot yourself and your new fishery "in the foot". Those 90 bass you stocked are easily capable of each growing an extra 1.5 to 2 lbs this year. Greg Grimes (Aquatic Environmental Services) has grown bass from fingerling to 3 to 5 lbs in one year for several clients including Arkansas.

Your lack of forage for these 90bass will likely result in them each not growing an average of 0.25 lb in 2014.
Predators to gain a pound need about 8-10 lbs of forage, usually fish. Each bass to grow 1.5-2 lbs needs 12 to 20 pounds of fish forage to get that amount of growth. Those 90 bass could reasonably eat 1080 to 1800 lbs of fish - almost a ton of forage (2000lbs) should be present in 2 acres; most of it consumed and some left over for spawning (see below).

I calculate from fishery literature data that the total weight of the forage fish you added was close to 128 lbs. Forage of 128 lbs will grow 12-13 lbs of weight gain for LMbass, if it is all eaten, and most of it will be eaten in your case due to the current stocking shortage. 90bass/12 pounds (192oz) of total gain potential = each bass can gain 2.1 ounces this year based on your current fish forage base. Ideally you want 30% to 50% of your forage fish as brooders to survive to the next spawn season.

Large bass of 10"-14" will not normally eat bluegill fry; so the 2014 BG spawn should not be considered 2014 food for your current LMB population of larger bass. LMB 10"-14" can and prefer to eat fish 3" to 5" long (BG-sunfish-shad-tilapia-adult shiners-small LMB); not fathead minnows. FHM are for growing bass primarily 2"-8" long. Once bass hit 10",,,,, FHM are a waste of money and wasted weight gain efficiency for growing larger predators such as LMB 12"+. The larger bass has to expend & waste too much body energy catching enough small minnows to fill its belly. Catching one larger fish uses about the same amount of energy as catching one minnow. Generally - Small forage items are for growing primarily small predators.

IMO you really shot yourself not in one foot, but both feet because the bass you added were not pellet trained. Larger pellet trained bass could be fed high protein pellets and still grow 1-1.5 lbs this year while the forage base increased and was supplimented.

IMO based on what you have done to date, I suggest that you remove as many LMB as possible if your goal is to grow bass 4 lbs to 5+ lbs. The remaining few 3 to 10 bass will provide more than enough new baby bass and maybe too many fingerling bass to feed on the 2014 forage hatch-offspring. Those 2014 year class of new bass should grow well if forage is adequate. A well fed LMB hatched in 2014 can be 10"-14" long in one year if it has unlimited food. Less food always means less growth. So when you buy one year old fish and they are comparatively small, depending on the species, that usually means they had food shortages which often occurs at fish farms where fish are raised too crowded. IMO it is a good idea always to ask how old the fish are when you buy them from a fish farm so you have some idea of how good the fish farm is. wink

After removing almost all the bass, restock at least twice the amount (180-250lbs) of the original forage fish stocked(128lbs) including adult golden shiners so ample new forage is present. This forage fish weight of 200-400 lbs, is about and often less than the amount of forage pounds that will grow from a spring stocking of forage fish and letting them spawn before adding predators. A good fertilized pound can EASILY grow 300lbs of forage per acre per year if no predators are present. Well managed ponds will grow more than 300lbs/ac/yr.

IMO your current path - plan, actually set your pond backwards and did not provide for an advanced fishery, at least not a high quality fishery. The large stocker bass will not grow to their potential. The growth that they do not get this year is lost forever and will not be recaptured. With the right amount of forage they will continue to grow but will always be behind the 1 - 2 lbs that was lost per fish in 2013-2014 growth year.

Based on your current path of working backwards, IMO your fishery does not have the potential to grow bass bigger than 3-4 lbs because the forage base is anemic, lacking, under sized and way under populated with the correct sizes of fish for feeding adult bass.

For in-depth extensive reading about growing LMB see this from the Pond Boss Common Pond Q&A Archives:
http://forums.pondboss.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=255372#Post255372
Posted By: DavidBiss Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 04:09 PM
Well - I was/am looking for opinions/facts on this issue. So while I certainly put myself behind, I'm committed to catching up, or retooling as the case may be -

So should I shock my pond and re-harvest the bass I put in?
Posted By: DavidBiss Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 04:11 PM
Or alternatively, how else should I throw some resources at this problem to fix it?
Posted By: DavidBiss Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 04:13 PM
How else could I throw resources to get this corrected?

Major purchase of some big forage fish?

Shcoking pond and removing bass?
Posted By: esshup Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 04:53 PM
IIRC Greg stocks forage fish for the LMB at a rate of 20 to 40 forage fish per LMB. IIRC he'll put 50 LMB in per acre. He doesn't stock LMB that are a size that can eat the CNBG in the pond, they are advanced fingerlings, that feed on the FHM, YOY GSH and YOY CNBG. But they grow dang fast, and start eating their way up the food chain quickly.

Here's some numbers to crunch. Like what was said, figure an average of 10# of forage fish to put 1# on 1 LMB. Keep those figures in mind.

A fertile pond that isn't aerated, nor has a supplemental feeding program can sustain roughly 300# of fish per surface acre. Not fertile?, drop that figure.

Bump that up to around 500# per surface acre if the pond has a good aeration system designed for it.

Bump THAT figure by another 200# or so if that same pond has a supplemental feeding program, feeding a good quality food.

Now, run those numbers back thru the 10# of food/pound of added weight to a LMB. Plan on roughly 100# of LMB per surface acre (max) of all sizes. That could be 10 fish 10# each, etc. Less if you want them to grow quick.

It's your call on what to do. With a goal of growing large LMB, either shock it to remove as many LMB as you can, fish the heck out of it and remove every LMB you catch, or add a bunch more forage fish. The LMB that you added could possibly spawn this year, which add even more LMB to the mix. I'd send a water sample to Texas A&M and tell us the results. You may have to lime, you may have to fertilize. If the water isn't fertile, then no matter how many fish you put in, it won't grow big fish. Without good water quality, the fish won't grow. Like trying to grow 200+ bu./acre of corn. If the soil doesn't have all the nutrients that the corn needs, you won't get the production, and that's what you are doing, is producing fish.

If it was my pond, I'd:
1) 2)Get the water tested, and lime/fertilize as required per the test.
2) 1)Call in a shock boat, and remove as many of the LMB as possible before they spawn.
3) Get the forage fish population established first before adding any more LMB.
4) Once the forage fish population is established, then add feed trained LMB, with good genetics - down your way, I'd go with Florida Genetics.
5) Get a feeding program established. First for the forage fish (which is what the CNBG are) and then later for the LMB.
6) Start researching aeration systems. With a fertile pond, the biomass will get large, and sooner rather than later, the O2 levels might drop. You don't want to go thru all this work just to have a fish kill. If the pocket book will allow it, I'd go with a bottom diffusion system to make the whole water column useable to the fish, and also go with surface agitation. The more O2 in the water, the better the water quality, and the less stress the fish will be under.

CNBG are the backbone of the forage fish population. Golden Shiners will help too. Threadfin Shad (Not Gizzard Shad) will help the pond greatly if they will survive in your area. Only when the the LMB are greater than "X" size would you consider stocking Gizzard Shad. But, that's way down the road if at all.

Go to the Pond Boss store and buy the book "Perfect Pond" and "Raising Trophy Bass". That will help answer a lot more questions that you never thought to ask.

But we'll still be here for ya!

What do you have in the pond for cover for the fish? (both forage fish and LMB)

David, I removed the duplicate post in the "new member introduction area" so that all the answers would be here under one post.
Posted By: Shorty Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 04:53 PM
IMO the removing as many LMB as possible will be your best option. Angling for them might be an effective option.
Posted By: RER Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 05:17 PM
in addition to removing LMB If you can get more ( adult or larger ) blue gill from Seining that would help IMO, some have concerns about adding wild fish from other bobies of water but you have already done that so it might help to do a little more , OF coarse they will need food too.....so feeding pellets might help them out.

Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 05:40 PM
Retenone and start over if you really want it done right. You'll only be 1 year behind instead of several.
Posted By: RER Re: Going in Backwards - 03/25/14 05:53 PM
Originally Posted By: CJBS2003
Retenone and start over if you really want it done right. You'll only be 1 year behind instead of several.


true, prob would catch up and surpass starting over vs curent path..Prob not anymore effort either
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 10:11 AM
David, welcome to Pond Boss. What part of Texas are you in? Lots of difference between Amarillo, El Paso, Texarkana, and the Big Thicket; especially when it concerns ponds.

You've gotten some good advice by some guys that know exactly what they are doing.

Neither angling, seining nor shocking is really all that effective at removing fish. The fish get use to the lures or bait and become conditioned. In other words, they get lockjaw. Shocking is mainly for sampling and won't get over 1% of the fish. With a seine, you'll only get shallow water fish and bass are notorious for dodging seines.

By now, you have figured out that you have done it all backwards. There is nothing unusual about stocking errors and a lot of people have made the mistake of what we call bucket and seine stocking. It seems simple but has very little chance of success in the long run. And, overall, you will find that stocking is the least expensive part of the process to having a well balanced pond.

I often use the illustration of cows in a pasture. You have stocked the equivalent of a bunch of young heifers in a pasture with very little grass. They continually over eat the grass and it never has a chance to grow. The ground bakes because nothing protects it from the sun. The cows do poorly and starve due to limited forage. The cows are the predator and the grass is the prey. It's the same with ponds and we often call BG/CNBG forage or fodder for bass.

If it were me, and it's not, I would probably rotenone the whole thing and start over. That's tough to do but I've tried it the other ways to no avail. You can't buy the rotenone and will have to hire a licensed applicator for that. But, overall, it will be your cheapest and most satisfying alternative.

Buy a feeder or 2 and feed the fish a good quality fish food. Resist the temptation to feed dog food or bread.

Start over with 2,000 small bluegills per acre, about 3 or 4 hundred Redear Sunfish per acre and about 5 pounds per acre of fathead minnows. Feed the fish. Resist the urge to add bass until the second year. If you decide to do it different and bucket stock again(it's up to you) wait until the 3rd year to start adding bass. Those things are eating and spawning machines.Then stock about 50 small bass per acre. I like some Florida genetics but not pure Floridas. Those things are too hard to catch and just aren't much fun. After a couple of years, start culling everything under 12 inches. After a couple more years start culling everything under 15 inches.

Monitor the body condition of the fish you catch and especially the BG. As my cow illustration above indicates, the best cattle rancher is a grass farmer. The condition and various sizes of the BG will be a determinant of whether your predator/prey relationship is correct and being correctly maintained.

Another thing I often say is to stock bass when they go to sleep with their mouth open and wake up with a full belly.

Your number one tool will be a continuous log of your observations of water conditions and the fish body conditions.

Oh yeah, take a water sample and send it to TAMU for analysis. Post the results here. This is a fairly important step.

Have fun and don't lie to your wife about the costs. You're gonna get caught and you just think you have problems now.

BTW, don't feel bad about what you have done. An awful lot of other people have done it and had to start over. One of them is me.
Posted By: DavidBiss Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 12:09 PM
I'm in NE Texas - near Paris - Thanks to all for the input - One last (desparate) attempt - What about buying a large number of large (6") bluegill that could withstand the bass at this stage and start generating some numbers with that? - I obviously have to spend some significant money to correct this - Could I not buy my way out of this by buying more and bigger bluegill???
Posted By: DavidBiss Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 12:10 PM
And Tiliapi
Posted By: RER Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 12:44 PM
Lots of large BG and tilapia would help. But the Bass really dont have anything to eat right now I think is the issue.

take a out bass when you can and add lots of bait fish ....
Posted By: george1 Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 01:21 PM
Originally Posted By: DavidBiss
I'm in NE Texas - near Paris - Thanks to all for the input - One last (desparate) attempt - What about buying a large number of large (6") bluegill that could withstand the bass at this stage and start generating some numbers with that? - I obviously have to spend some significant money to correct this - Could I not buy my way out of this by buying more and bigger bluegill???

David, our ponds are south of Paris about halfway to Sulphur Springs - Chris Steelman is N.E. of Paris so you have near neighbors.

If any consolation, I made the same mistake more than 10 years ago - corrected the problem and happy to share experience.
You are on the right track Could I not buy my way out of this by buying more and bigger bluegill???
That's exactly the way I solved my problem!

Your problem is much worse however and will take some deep poickets with this approach..
I only stocked 14 adult LMB and was advised by Bob lusk to stock 7 hand size BG for each bass stocked.

I love CNBG and had previously stocked pure genetic fingerlings from Bob Waldrop from Tyler Fish Farm but he had no large CNBG. I located some pure CNBG from a local source, now out of business - worked for me.

Todd Overton of Overton Fisheries in Buffalo is the only supplier of large pure CNBG that I know of. He hatches and grows out his own fish, whereas most fisheries buy Arkansas fish and re-sell.

Good luck and PM if I can be of help.
George Glazener
Posted By: Bill Cody Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 02:21 PM
You have good advice so far. Most of us have been there done that.
My intent is not to be negative but realistic.
Great advice & explanation from DD1. You have been provided several good options each will lead to a decent pond but maybe not to regularly producing 8 lb to 10 lb bass in a small 2 ac pond.

I think the Bob Lusk's advice of 7 lg BG for each current large bass via George1 is sort of out dated and occurred years ago and directed or intended for salvaging that specific pond and not necessarily for growing trophy bass which you said is your goal. Lusk will probably agree. I am pretty sure Lusk would advise you differently today. If anyone doubts me,,, call him and pay him to evaluate your situation.

IMO in your current situation with 90 larger LMB, you will likely and within reason never get to where you commonly grow 8 lb to 10 lb bass in 2 ac. If you only had 6-10 female LMB in the pond, then yes that can be done. If you seriously want even a chance to do that, then start over. We do not know the age and growth potential of the bucket biology or stocker bass. Even if you start over, it is really difficult to consistently and for one in the long term to grow 8 lb+ reproducing bass in a small 2 ac pond unless you perform the best and 'out of the box' management practices. Plus you will need deep pockets to supplementally stock proper forage each year, such as trout (7"-10") and treadfins.

One path to 8 lb-10 lb LMB is to use gizzard shad when the bass get above the 5 lb range. I'm not sure this is even feasible in a 2 ac pond when the ecosystem is small and somewhat limited. If the pond was 20 ac then yes maybe gizzard shad are a good choice. All interested should read B.Lusk's book raising Trophy Bass - publ. 2000. Personally I think this good book is getting outdated and needs to have an updated 2nd edition that incorporates new information since the original was written.
http://www.pondboss.com/store.asp?c=8

If you think you want to buy your way out of the current situation, then go back and read my previous plan. You will need at least 200-400 lbs of mixed size and species of forage, and 400-600 lbs in 2 ac would be better. Even that amount of forage IMO will not lead to the 8 lb+ bass probably because the current bass genetics were likely not the best they could be. Genetics are a key item to producing consistent trophy bass over the long term. The 3 other necessary items are: a. habitat - including water body size & optimum fertility & productivity, b. optimum forage, and c. best management. IMO you are currently weak on all four requirements. How do you expect to grow the cows in DD1's example without proper grass or food? I think you can realistically salvage your current situation and regularly produce 3-5lb bass but not commonly and consistently grow and catch 8 lb+ bass in a 2 ac mixed sex pond.

The example I gave for G.Grimes producing 3 - 5 lb bass in one year was in larger waters than 2 ac; often it is in 15-40+ ac.

It would be a very interesting and educational experiment to see how many of those 90 bass that you could catch by angling out of the pond before they spawn.
Posted By: 4CornersPuddle Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 02:34 PM
Possible corrective action for the overpopulation of LMB?????
Would it be at all feasible to target spawning LMB on the nest? I'm thinking diligently search for nests, remove all bass that you could catch from the nests so the eggs or fry would be vulnerable to predation (BG), seine or otherwise capture every black ball of bass fry you could? All the while stocking more large BG. As Bill has indicated above 3 to 10 bass could be all or more than you need right now. However, short of nuking or draining your pond, you'd be moving in the direction you desire.
IMO it would be a fun time on the water, harassing those LMB. Every minute I spend at pond's edge allows me to get to know the BOW better; sure beats going to work.
I've been guiding my small pond for 4 years now with ideas from this forum. I'm fascinated by the project and enjoy the results.
Please keep us in the loop.
Posted By: RC51 Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 02:44 PM
I have to agree with Bill here. I bought a pond 4 years ago and it already had LMB in it. A bunch of 12 inch and under. I caught as many of those as I could and then put in 250 CNBG in the 2 inch range! Haha that was a joke! Needless to say they didn't last! I still had LMB in there and they ate 95 percent of them up. Plus I didn't have any decent habitat in the water either. I LOVE LMB too and I wanted some nice bass so I then turned around and bought 100 6 inch plus CNBG well they made it and started spawning and then I put in a few other LMB Florida strain to mix things up a little. Well I now have some nice 3 pound bass about 17 inches but it's taken 4 years just to get that! Why? Because I did it backwards. Course my goal was not to have 8+ pound bass either. I am just fine with 3 to 4 pound bass so it kind of worked out for me in the end, but it's taken a long time and I will never have 8 pound bass let alone 10.

RC
Posted By: Bill Cody Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 03:00 PM
All good advice from experience. Maybe D.Bliss should rethink his goals?? Numerous 3-4 lb bass with the occasional one 5 lbs is realistic for a 2 ac pond when you proceed backwards, sideways or forwards. It would be educational for all of us to have Lusk or anyone else that regularly grows 8 lb+ bass weigh in on this one.
Posted By: esshup Re: Going in Backwards - 03/26/14 03:40 PM
David: 2 questions.

1) What do you consider a "big bass"?

2) How large is the pond now? From reading your post, I get the assumption that it is only one acre now (50% full).

Cody Note: yes maybe we incorrectly assumed that a big bass in TX was 8lb+?? A big bass to some anglers is 3-5 lbs.
Posted By: DavidBiss Re: Going in Backwards - 03/27/14 01:49 PM
You guys are awesome - I truly appreciate ALL the input and time you take to provide some insights, facts and opinions. As to the last post - Size of Bass - I would be beyond ecstatic if I could get to a point whereby there would be a good chance to catch bass in the 5-8 lb range. Based on what I read before I started the project that 8+ pound bass would be highly unlikely in a 2 ac pond size. However, dirt budget and land considerations limited me to this size.

As far as how full currently - When full to spill point - it will be a 2.1 acre size - area wise - I'm probably at 1.5 to 1.7 acres - water volume wise I'm probably only 60% full

More questions have come to mind -
If my pond is low on forage - will not the baby bass born on spawn be subject to being eaten and as such somewhat keep a lid on bass population?

Secondly - Another part of this story - I have access (may soon own) a 3/4 acre pond basically adjacent to my pond. I'm conjuring up a strategy to stock that pond up with 3-4" CNBG and Tilapia when water temp allows for Tilapia (late April) and feed the snot out of it. Then about September - pump that pond dry (I could use the water in my pond) and easily move all those CNBG and Tilapi. If the CNBG and Tilapia are allowed to reproduce without predation (in the 3/4 acre pond) - wouldn't I have an incredible amount of forage fish to add to my 2 acre pond that may then prove to be 'enough'

I would simultaneously add 600 -700 of the 6" CNBG to my 2 ac pond now and add 20lbs or so of Tilapia to my 2 ac pond as well

What do you guys think?
Posted By: DavidBiss Re: Going in Backwards - 03/27/14 01:58 PM
Follow up - currently I do have pretty good coverage - it is not an open bowl -

I have 8-10 big dead cedars, several other trees, brush etc..- I know this is relative, but it is not one big open bowl
Posted By: Bill Cody Re: Going in Backwards - 03/27/14 02:14 PM
There are numerous ways to proceed and approach your current situation. Having a 3/4 ac forage pond changes how you can proceed and your options. Adding forage from the 0.7 ac pond will do a lot to maintain a strong forage base in the 2 ac pond. Below is an indication of how much forage you may need to add per acre for growing large bass.

You and other big bass or predator lovers with smaller ponds can think about this "out of the box" approach as an option for growing or raising trophy LMB in a small 1-2 ac pond.

If the two ponds were mine at my point in life, and my dream was big LMbass of 5 lbs to 10 lbs in a one to two ac pond, I would stock the pond with forage and then only add female bass caught during spawn season. BENEFITS: Competition would be kept to a minimum and you have very good control of predator numbers which we have learned is especially important when trying to grow trophy fish (see later). No over population problems unless you make a 'sexing' mistake. Preferably I would try and use pellet trained females that could eat the AquaMax big bass pellets (1") and forage. Feed trained bass would allow you to monitor their sizes, relative condition, their numbers and watch them as pets which would be pretty amazing and unique.

You would not have to add all the female bass at once, but add them over the period of a few years - a few each year as you are able to get them. Then after several years, as they start dying of old age periodically add a few females each year to keep the numbers around 30 and depending on what their body condition is (Rw) and the amount of proper forage present to feed big bass. Remember big bass do not grow well eating small 4"-6" forage items (see later).

Instead of using pellet trained bass or addition to, you could with time and concerted effort, also teach them to eat hand fed fish. A few posts here have discussed that option notably Herman Brothers and Bruce Condello. PBoss member 'gar king' has a videos on this forum of hand feeding bass.
Hand feeding bass
http://forums.pondboss.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Main=26245&Number=335870#Post335870

http://forums.pondboss.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Main=26066&Number=333550#Post333550

http://forums.pondboss.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Main=25493&Number=325080#Post325080

http://forums.pondboss.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Main=25627&Number=327372#Post327372


The technique has some specific methods for teaching the fish to make it work conveniently. My dad & I did similar things of hand feeding big bass fresh fish in our new pond back in the 1970's. It works. I think you could realistically grow 25-35 female bass (4 to 10 lbs ave 5-6 lbs; range 2-10 lbs) in 2 ac.

To put the number of big bass per acre in perspective read this from B.Lusk. ""Look at bass larger than 5 pounds with reverence. Be awed. Not only have these bass eaten a lot, they have avoided being eaten...a lot.
An eight pound bass is probably six years old. It has lived only half its "normal" life.
In a "great" 25 acre trophy bass lake, there are likely fewer than 25 bass larger than six pounds.""

So if one can have 20-25 only big female bass in 2 acres of water that is truly a very unique fishery and great accomplishment, not to mention very rare.

The following is a quote from a place that specializes in growing big bass. It is not real well written but the idea is evident.
"" Here is number one pitfall of most trophy bass lakes. These large monster bass reproduce a lot of little bass and you must comment to removing these smaller bass. This is the hardest job in raise trophy bass. This is the number one cause of failure in trophy bass lake. Most trophy bass lakes are private and don't have the fishing presser to remove those smaller bass. These smaller bass grow very quickly and consume a lot feed intend for your trophy bass. This is where your food supply gets out of whack.""

Thus for a smaller body of water an alternative method to grow big bass is to stock single sex female bass and you have prevented one of the big problems of too many bass eating too much of the available food and thus not growing or even worse loosing weight which commonly occurs when one transfers big bass into a new pond with improper forage.

It is my experience that bass almost always grow to a size that is allowed by the limits of the forage community.

Norm Latovia from Southeastern Pond Management - AL: Next discusses how much forage it takes to grow big bass and keep big bass growing.

""Recent research suggests that largemouth bass, under optimal conditions, are capable of consuming as much as 5 percent of their body weight daily. That means a 5-pound bass, feeding at maximum efficiency, will consume a quarter pound per day ... nearly 2 pounds per week... over 50 pounds during a normal growing season (March-October).
That's 10 times its body weight, just during the growing season!
Let's assume that the typical pond has roughly 125 pounds per acre of largemouth bass, ranging in size from juveniles to mature adults. Given this model, these individuals would consume as much as six-plus pounds of forage per day... over 40 pounds in a week ... and more than 1,300 pounds in a growing season. This is for one acre!"".


Posted By: esshup Re: Going in Backwards - 03/27/14 03:14 PM
David:

I agree with Bill on the options that you have with the forage pond. Just remember that the species of Tilapia that you stock in Texas don't survive water temps much below 60°F range and will die when water temps drop below 50°F or so.

My pond was (and still is to an extent) forage light in regards to LMB. I stocked non-feed trained LMB in the beginning, but when I noticed them eating themselves out of house and home, I stocked 39 feed trained LMB that I tagged and have a standing rule that every LMB not tagged comes out, no matter what the size. 2" or 5#, if it isn't tagged, it comes out. I don't have a lot of cover in there for the forage fish to hide in, so the LMB eat a LOT of them. Too many, I'm afraid. That's why I am switching over to feed trained LMB. I can cut down on the amount of forage fish they eat with pellets. They aren't all female, but as of last year any male seen on a spawning bed gets removed. Unfortunately, they still somehow manage to pull off a spawn and the YOY LMB still eat a lot of YOY forage fish.

Take a look at this relative weight chart. Pay attention to the length/weight of the LMB.
http://www.fish.state.pa.us/images/pages/fishin1/weightlength3.pdf

Look and see how much a 17" to 18" LMB should weigh.

In October of 2012, I removed a LMB that was 17.5" long and 4 1/4#. (No tag, so it was removed). I could not tell if it was that size because of learning how to eat pellets, or just because it had plenty of forage fish to eat. The previous year I had added over 2,000 2"-4" BG to the pond, and annually stock 40#-50# of Tilapia along with feeding the fish in the pond. The year before that I also added somewhere between 1,000 and 2,000 2"-5" BG to the pond.

It's taken me 5 years to start to rectify my mistake of having too many LMB in the pond for the amount of forage in it. It's taken a combination of adding a LOT of forage along with removing a LOT of LMB. You have the opportunity to shave 4-5 years off of your learning curve if you jump on top of the problem now.

From your responses, I know you don't want to hear this, but to achieve your goals YOU HAVE TOO MANY LMB IN YOUR POND. Let me repeat that. YOU HAVE TOO MANY LMB IN YOUR POND. Living in the climate that you do, you have the potential to grow much larger LMB in your pond than we do up here if you get the right genetics in there. Do you know if the LMB you stocked are Northern strain, Florida strain or F1's?

If I was down there and that was my pond, I'd get all the LMB out of there before they spawn this year and restock with good genetic feed trained LMB, going with straight females if at all possible like Bill said. If done right, I'd bet you could be catching 4-5 pound LMB in 2 years or less.

By leaving all those LMB in your pond you will run into a wall in regards to carrying capacity in your pond. Remember, a pond can only support around 100# of LMB per acre, maybe a bit more if they are pellet trained and you also supplement their forage fish food base. But, remember they need Oxygen to survive, and the more pounds of fish in there, the more O2 they need.
Posted By: Bill Cody Re: Going in Backwards - 03/27/14 04:06 PM
More fish than standard carrying capacity also results in reduced water quality. Reduced water quality is stressful to fish, thus fish will eat less and grow less during stressful water quality conitions, thus you are losing growth rate of all existing fish. As Bob Lusk says "every day that the bass does not fill its belly is one day it does not grow."

To get to 10 lbs it needs to grow every day. Good year round water quality is important for growing trophy fish. It is not an accident that some waters consistently produce trophy class fish. All of B.Lusk's four needed 'features' or conditions noted in my post above need to 'come together' for the ability to have trophy fish water. Fish over crowding is not one of those 'features'.

Here are just a few words and just couple of the several requirements from Bob Lusk about growing big bass that are in the trophy category.
""When a bass can eat those smaller bass, its world changes. Its behavior changes, its food chain changes and its growth rates change.
Bigger bass have larger habits. They dominate the best habitat. They eat whatever they want. A six pound bass will readily eat a two pound bass.!!!!!!!!!
So, the keys are:
Provide habitat for all sizes of each species you need.
Make sure you have adequate amounts of the right size food sources at the right time.
Cull young, slow growing fish...keep catch records and pay attention to body condition of your fish.
Genetics are important.
Get bass from fingerling to 16.5" as fast as possible.""

With Greg Grimes' bass growing philosophy and methods you can grow bass from fingerling to 16"-18" in one year given a 10-11 month growing season. 4" to 18" is 1.27" per month growth rate. This equates to a growth rate of about 1.07 mm/day for 11 months. The fish has to be growing every day to reach the trophy size category.

Posted By: ewest Re: Going in Backwards - 03/27/14 05:35 PM
What Bill describes can be done. It will take work. The concept to worry about is carrying capacity. It is dangerous and difficult to run the engine that is your pond at full capacity for long periods of time. Shoot for a few less LMB and a little more room for error. You could also add a bonus fish (a few HSB) and cut down on the CC and LMB. Water quality will be critical especially if you are prone to drought.

Cody note - reduced water quality for whatever reason including drought results in the predators not feeding. We know by now what happens when the bass are not feeding. More stress events will occur more frequently as 'ewest' suggests when the pond is above carrying capacity. As fish grow and gain weight the standing stock increases and carrying capacity becomes over loaded. This is why beginning with fewer large bass per acre is beneficial in the long term. Growing big bass is not easy nor simple.
© Pond Boss Forum