A Dream Turned to Fruition (and Mas Questiones) - 03/23/08 02:39 AM
First of all, let me say thank you to everyone who has helped us with our pond projects. My dad and I really enjoy and appreciate this forum. We want to thank the countless PB friends who have given us direct advice, as well as those who have taught us indirectly simply by sharing their stories even when they didn’t realize they were helping us or giving us great ideas. I only hope we can start to give back as much as we’ve received once we start to learn and gain more PB experience.
We haven’t met our goals yet, but we’re well on our way. The little BG pond (1/4-1/5 acre) still has too many fish and is too nutrient-rich, but the BG are in great body shape despite the overcrowding. We should probably stop feeding until we get the constant blooms under control. We’ve also been catching BG from 6-10” and transporting them to other ponds. We’ve probably taken out 40-50 so far. We did catch a 5” LMB in that pond (despite hoping that the abundant BG would keep LMB reproduction to a minimum). The few adult LMB we purposefully put in are fat & happy with all the BG, fatheads, and gambusias. There are also a few CCs and HSB in there as well, but that is not the focus of the pond. They are more of a “bonus” fish that we can catch occasionally. Neither should reproduce, which is why they’re allowed to remain in that pond.
I posted this pic of a BG on the thread “Questions about Raising Bluegills,” but here it is again:
Here is one of the happy LMB:
The CC pond (1.5- 2 acres) is still turbid (more on that below), but the fish are doing well on the pellet food. We see a few CCs come up and feed that measure WELL over a foot whisker tip to whisker tip. I’m guessing we have a few about 10 lbs? The few adult LMB in there are getting large, but they’re nearly impossible catch on artificials with the extremely low visibility. We’re trying to clear the pond to the point we can enjoy catching other species, but the focus will remain CCs.
The big pond (4-5 acres), although low, is gorgeous. Since we haven’t posted any updates lately, here are a few pics of the finished product. As soon as the water level rises again, it’ll really be something. The biggest thing we’re trying to remember is that all of our ponds are still young and that helps curb our expectations at this point. Nonetheless, the LMB, HSB, CC, and even the BG and RES are looking nice.
Here is a shot of the main dock with the small dock for the 2nd feeder in the background:
In this pic, you can see the “little” island to the right and the “big” island to the left. Off frame to the left is more open water and the dam side, while off frame to the right are the two docks and two inlets.
Here is a little closer shot of the two docks.
Now for the actual fish in the big pond. Here are two examples of the young, fat LMB. Unfortunately, I don’t have any pics of Todd Overton’s famous LLMB [Longhorn LMB], which is our feed-trained, tagged LMB that have an orange hue when they feed. We've caught them repeatedly, though, and their relative weights are really something.
Young LMB:
Yesterday, we really got into the HSB. My dad and I literally had a simultaneous hook-up, which was fun to say the least.
Here is the HSB double.
Here is a pic of a HSB caught on our rosey-red imitation lure. Yes, we stocked roseys.
Another HSB:
They aren’t the monsters of Bruce and George, but we’re getting there. They sure enjoy the Aquamax LMB pellets!
Finally, while trying to sample big BG and small LMB in the big pond, we caught this little gem. Recognize the lure?
I don’t know why, but our CCs in the big pond have consistently hit lures. It adds another dimension I’m not used to, and it sure makes the fishing more fun. You never know what’s coming when you set the hook.
Last but not least, we’re building a new pond. Not just ANY pond . . . a CRAPPIE pond! This one is separated from the big pond by a high dirt road, and barring a major flood, they’ll stay that way.
It will be 1.5- 2 acres. Right now, we’re planning on stocking Roseys/FHs, GSH, Black Crappie, and HSB. Possibly threadfin shad as well.
Stocking: First, add FHs, FHs, and more FHs while getting the water clearer.
Then add GSH and Crappie fingerlings.
Add mature RES for a bonus fish and a small boost of forage. Hopefully Todd Overton will be able to provide some mature RES (1/2-3/4 lb) so that we can stock them after the FH, GSH, and Crappie.
The goal: We’re hoping Crappie and FHs/rosey complement each other. For the deeper, open water, we’re hoping HSB and GSH fill the predator/forage niche. The threadfins would help here as well.
***We’ll possibly add mature female-only LMB after 2 years if we feel the HSB (and fishermen) are not adequately controlling the crappie numbers.
***NO BG. The reason we don’t want BG is because I think BG-Crappie combination would be tougher to control than Crappie and FHs. We’re willing to repeatedly re-stock FHs as much as necessary. I know that adult LMB actually lose weight chasing FHs, but would this happen with Crappie? I’m assuming Crappie are small enough that an abundance of FHs would allow consumption > energy spent. Any thoughts?
Are we on the right track with this plan? We don’t have actual stocking numbers yet . . . right now we’re trying to solidify species. Also, is it the general consensus that black crappie are better than white crappie for this size pond? I know that black crappie do not produce as many eggs as white crappie and, in theory, should be easier to control. On the other hand, black crappie thrive better in clear water, and our water is likely to be turbid until treated with at least one ton of gypsum. Right now we’re still leaning toward black crappie.
Here are a few pics of the recent pond construction. Hopfully after it is finished, the much-needed rains will come!
First is the obligatory in-action construction photo:
Here is a shot of the soon-to-be dam.
On the left is the road that separates the big pond from the new pond. It will be elevated even more. Also, the cement culvert pipes in the photo will provide great structure when the pond is finished.
The new pond will have a long peninsula with about 12’ of water on either side. This is the beginning of the peninsula.
Finally, here is a shot across the pond of the trees awaiting their new home at the bottom of the pond.
If you’ve read this far, you deserve a gold star. However . . .
I do have two more questions:
Due to drought, our CC pond (~1.5 acres) is about 8’ max depth right now. Visibility is anywhere from 0” to 2”—drinkable if you like coffee with lots of cream, as Theo would say. Yesterday we added our first batch of gypsum—36 bags at 40 lbs each. The tilapia wintered in this pond despite the drought depth and the occasional freeze . We’ve seen them large and small feeding on pellets with the CCs.
In the big pond, we have yet to see a tilapia since the fall. We’re hoping at least some of them wintered. That pond is at least 15’ deep even with the drought, and visibility fluctuates but is usually around 12”. In theory, the tilapia should have wintered in the bigger, deeper pond and NOT in the shallower, smaller pond, but the opposite seems to be true.
Could the muddier water in the CC pond have helped the tilapia make it through the winter, even if the CC pond is shallower? If clarity/suspended clay particles have anything to do with temperature of the water and/or its effects on fish, how much difference can it make?
I did find a website that said: “Turbidity is the condition resulting from suspended solids in the water, including silts, clays, industrial wastes, sewage and plankton. Such particles absorb heat in the sunlight, thus raising water temperature, which in turn lowers dissolved oxygen levels.”
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/fenlewis/Waterquality.html
This answers part of the question, but I still don’t know whether extremely turbid water keeps the temperature high enough to save tilapia despite shallower water. In other words, I don’t know how MUCH turbidity helps keep water temperature up.
Another thought: If fish cannot sight-feed as well in the low visibility water, then it’s possible that the tilapia survived the winter even if they got sluggish in the cold water. In the larger pond with more visibility, sluggish tilapia, even if they would have survived like in the CC pond, might have been easy pickins’ for the large LMB and CCs this winter.
Any other thoughts as to if/how the tilapia were able to winter in the CC pond but not the big pond?
My second question relates to the gypsum application. Ignoring muddy water, does the gypsum spread better when the water temperature is warmer or cooler?
I know that as water temperature drops, density increases (until about 34 degrees). The converse is obviously true—when water temperature rises, the water becomes less dense. Would density affect how fast gypsum either settles to the bottom or disperses throughout the water column? If so, I’m assuming that it is best to apply gypsum in cooler, denser water. Of course, we used a trolling motor prop to spread the gypsum, but it is still hard to tell how much settles to the bottom and how much actually disperses.
Thanks for all the help!
We haven’t met our goals yet, but we’re well on our way. The little BG pond (1/4-1/5 acre) still has too many fish and is too nutrient-rich, but the BG are in great body shape despite the overcrowding. We should probably stop feeding until we get the constant blooms under control. We’ve also been catching BG from 6-10” and transporting them to other ponds. We’ve probably taken out 40-50 so far. We did catch a 5” LMB in that pond (despite hoping that the abundant BG would keep LMB reproduction to a minimum). The few adult LMB we purposefully put in are fat & happy with all the BG, fatheads, and gambusias. There are also a few CCs and HSB in there as well, but that is not the focus of the pond. They are more of a “bonus” fish that we can catch occasionally. Neither should reproduce, which is why they’re allowed to remain in that pond.
I posted this pic of a BG on the thread “Questions about Raising Bluegills,” but here it is again:
Here is one of the happy LMB:
The CC pond (1.5- 2 acres) is still turbid (more on that below), but the fish are doing well on the pellet food. We see a few CCs come up and feed that measure WELL over a foot whisker tip to whisker tip. I’m guessing we have a few about 10 lbs? The few adult LMB in there are getting large, but they’re nearly impossible catch on artificials with the extremely low visibility. We’re trying to clear the pond to the point we can enjoy catching other species, but the focus will remain CCs.
The big pond (4-5 acres), although low, is gorgeous. Since we haven’t posted any updates lately, here are a few pics of the finished product. As soon as the water level rises again, it’ll really be something. The biggest thing we’re trying to remember is that all of our ponds are still young and that helps curb our expectations at this point. Nonetheless, the LMB, HSB, CC, and even the BG and RES are looking nice.
Here is a shot of the main dock with the small dock for the 2nd feeder in the background:
In this pic, you can see the “little” island to the right and the “big” island to the left. Off frame to the left is more open water and the dam side, while off frame to the right are the two docks and two inlets.
Here is a little closer shot of the two docks.
Now for the actual fish in the big pond. Here are two examples of the young, fat LMB. Unfortunately, I don’t have any pics of Todd Overton’s famous LLMB [Longhorn LMB], which is our feed-trained, tagged LMB that have an orange hue when they feed. We've caught them repeatedly, though, and their relative weights are really something.
Young LMB:
Yesterday, we really got into the HSB. My dad and I literally had a simultaneous hook-up, which was fun to say the least.
Here is the HSB double.
Here is a pic of a HSB caught on our rosey-red imitation lure. Yes, we stocked roseys.
Another HSB:
They aren’t the monsters of Bruce and George, but we’re getting there. They sure enjoy the Aquamax LMB pellets!
Finally, while trying to sample big BG and small LMB in the big pond, we caught this little gem. Recognize the lure?
I don’t know why, but our CCs in the big pond have consistently hit lures. It adds another dimension I’m not used to, and it sure makes the fishing more fun. You never know what’s coming when you set the hook.
Last but not least, we’re building a new pond. Not just ANY pond . . . a CRAPPIE pond! This one is separated from the big pond by a high dirt road, and barring a major flood, they’ll stay that way.
It will be 1.5- 2 acres. Right now, we’re planning on stocking Roseys/FHs, GSH, Black Crappie, and HSB. Possibly threadfin shad as well.
Stocking: First, add FHs, FHs, and more FHs while getting the water clearer.
Then add GSH and Crappie fingerlings.
Add mature RES for a bonus fish and a small boost of forage. Hopefully Todd Overton will be able to provide some mature RES (1/2-3/4 lb) so that we can stock them after the FH, GSH, and Crappie.
The goal: We’re hoping Crappie and FHs/rosey complement each other. For the deeper, open water, we’re hoping HSB and GSH fill the predator/forage niche. The threadfins would help here as well.
***We’ll possibly add mature female-only LMB after 2 years if we feel the HSB (and fishermen) are not adequately controlling the crappie numbers.
***NO BG. The reason we don’t want BG is because I think BG-Crappie combination would be tougher to control than Crappie and FHs. We’re willing to repeatedly re-stock FHs as much as necessary. I know that adult LMB actually lose weight chasing FHs, but would this happen with Crappie? I’m assuming Crappie are small enough that an abundance of FHs would allow consumption > energy spent. Any thoughts?
Are we on the right track with this plan? We don’t have actual stocking numbers yet . . . right now we’re trying to solidify species. Also, is it the general consensus that black crappie are better than white crappie for this size pond? I know that black crappie do not produce as many eggs as white crappie and, in theory, should be easier to control. On the other hand, black crappie thrive better in clear water, and our water is likely to be turbid until treated with at least one ton of gypsum. Right now we’re still leaning toward black crappie.
Here are a few pics of the recent pond construction. Hopfully after it is finished, the much-needed rains will come!
First is the obligatory in-action construction photo:
Here is a shot of the soon-to-be dam.
On the left is the road that separates the big pond from the new pond. It will be elevated even more. Also, the cement culvert pipes in the photo will provide great structure when the pond is finished.
The new pond will have a long peninsula with about 12’ of water on either side. This is the beginning of the peninsula.
Finally, here is a shot across the pond of the trees awaiting their new home at the bottom of the pond.
If you’ve read this far, you deserve a gold star. However . . .
I do have two more questions:
Due to drought, our CC pond (~1.5 acres) is about 8’ max depth right now. Visibility is anywhere from 0” to 2”—drinkable if you like coffee with lots of cream, as Theo would say. Yesterday we added our first batch of gypsum—36 bags at 40 lbs each. The tilapia wintered in this pond despite the drought depth and the occasional freeze . We’ve seen them large and small feeding on pellets with the CCs.
In the big pond, we have yet to see a tilapia since the fall. We’re hoping at least some of them wintered. That pond is at least 15’ deep even with the drought, and visibility fluctuates but is usually around 12”. In theory, the tilapia should have wintered in the bigger, deeper pond and NOT in the shallower, smaller pond, but the opposite seems to be true.
Could the muddier water in the CC pond have helped the tilapia make it through the winter, even if the CC pond is shallower? If clarity/suspended clay particles have anything to do with temperature of the water and/or its effects on fish, how much difference can it make?
I did find a website that said: “Turbidity is the condition resulting from suspended solids in the water, including silts, clays, industrial wastes, sewage and plankton. Such particles absorb heat in the sunlight, thus raising water temperature, which in turn lowers dissolved oxygen levels.”
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/fenlewis/Waterquality.html
This answers part of the question, but I still don’t know whether extremely turbid water keeps the temperature high enough to save tilapia despite shallower water. In other words, I don’t know how MUCH turbidity helps keep water temperature up.
Another thought: If fish cannot sight-feed as well in the low visibility water, then it’s possible that the tilapia survived the winter even if they got sluggish in the cold water. In the larger pond with more visibility, sluggish tilapia, even if they would have survived like in the CC pond, might have been easy pickins’ for the large LMB and CCs this winter.
Any other thoughts as to if/how the tilapia were able to winter in the CC pond but not the big pond?
My second question relates to the gypsum application. Ignoring muddy water, does the gypsum spread better when the water temperature is warmer or cooler?
I know that as water temperature drops, density increases (until about 34 degrees). The converse is obviously true—when water temperature rises, the water becomes less dense. Would density affect how fast gypsum either settles to the bottom or disperses throughout the water column? If so, I’m assuming that it is best to apply gypsum in cooler, denser water. Of course, we used a trolling motor prop to spread the gypsum, but it is still hard to tell how much settles to the bottom and how much actually disperses.
Thanks for all the help!