|
Forums36
Topics40,947
Posts557,801
Members18,484
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
11 members (jludwig, FishinRod, Donatello, DrewSh, shores41, Steve Clubb, Justin W, Joe7328, catscratch, Knobber, John Folchetti),
973
guests, and
238
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
If a specific post was interesting or useful to you, we recommend that you Like that post. It tells the post author, and others, that you found the information valuable. Clicking Like is another way to let others know that you enjoy it without leaving a comment.
Log in to join the conversation and Like this content.
|
|
|
Re: WOTUS
#555375
Feb 4th a 07:56 PM
|
by RAH |
RAH |
Ponds also can mitigate both flooding and droughts in waterways downstream by releasing water in a more uniform manner over time. Our local streams flood and then dry out due to quick release by agricultural field tiles. Ponds can catch and store this water for less dramatic extremes downstream. I would have no problem if the benefits from my land on others allowed everyone's tax dollars to pay the permitting and bureaucratic costs associated with evaluating projects, but under the current system, I cannot afford the government overhead for projects that would benefit the environment for everyone. Just one of the unintended effects of poorly constructed regulation.
|
|
|
|
|