|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,285 Likes: 1
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,285 Likes: 1 |
Above the water line the banks can be fairly flat for easy mowing. Below the water line most recommend 3:1 to discourage weed growth. I have two sides where the slope is 3:1 and two at 5:1 below the water line and have found no significant difference where submerged and emergent plants grow but this is only year 5 for me and I do manage for a weedless pond. Above the water level the banks vary from nearly flat with very moderat swales for surface drainage to 3:1. If I had it to do over I would have built the 3:1 bank at a more gradual slope for safer mowing. One nice thing about steeper banks is less mud is exposed as the water level drops in dry weather. I think any steeper than 3:1 would be a hazard if someone were to fall in because 3:1 is about as steep as I can climb out of when swimming.
 "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." Stephen W. Hawking
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|