After lurking this site for a couple of years now and making just an occasional comment, I've come to realize that about the only thing we all have in common is some configeration of a hole in the ground with water in it. Possibly not even that for some after this years drought.

As a kid back in the late 50's and early 60's the family pond I fished was what we know now as one "bass heavy" but the fishing was great. Modern practices of feeding, fertilizing, liming, aeration, etc. were mostly unheard of. When you fished, you caught fish, fellowshipped with others, enjoyed nature and the peace and quiet of the pond and its surroundings. Distractions were few.

That pond is now the property of others. However, aesthetics and tradition now mean everything to me and my family's current pond. As much as is possible, I want it as of old. It is now three years old and I have fed the bream to jump-start them to a catchable size (3/4-1 lb.) but I think I'm going to stop feeding. I don't mind the expense. I do mind the fish crowding to one area and acting like a lot of humans; greedy and lazy. I don't even like the appearance of the feeder. It is not aesthetically pleasing to me. My plan from now forward is to fertilize only to maintain a visibility of approximately 24" from spring through fall and lime as needed. I want my bream to roam the whole pond (six acres) and fishing to be enjoyed over the whole pond. I know I will sacrifice ultimate size but the trade-off to me is worth it.

My philosophy I realize is not for all. The trade-off between production, aesthetics, and tradition is ongoing. To each his own. I must say though I enjoy reading every article in "Pond Boss" whether they apply to my situation or not. I have also learned a lot from those who post on this site who know far more about pond management than do I.

F.A. Walker