|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,701
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,678 Likes: 509
Moderator Lunker
|
|
Moderator Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,678 Likes: 509 |
It would take someone good with numbers who I really trusted to convince me that ponds increase evaporation, as opposed to lettting water run downstream unopposed (I must add that there are a large number of people at this forum who would qualify to do this). My pond, the creek downstream, the river below it, and the reservoir some municipality draws water from all have surfaces that evaporate water - IMO it would take a pretty extensive study to know which lost the most water based on depth, volume surface area, flow rates, and who knows what else that would affect evaporation (Temperature? Air flow? Where to stop???)
As far as complaining about surface water lost because it recharges underground aquifers - that's like complaining that someone is putting money in the bank. Everyone who uses a well for their water, including many municipalities, ought to be greatful for anyone who helps recharge ground water.
"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever." -S. M. Stirling
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|