|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,037 Likes: 483
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,037 Likes: 483 |
Twice is good with me. But this does prove a very good point. The speed of the internet and how far out in front the PB forum is.
I saw 2 science type articles (by people who are supposed to be up on all things fish) in the brand new In-Fisherman mag. - got it this week. One was about Round-up and frogs -old news and they didn't even report that it was not the active ingredient (GLYPHOSATE) that was the problem but the surfactant - they just took a cheap shot at the product. Second was they reported on a study that PFF reported on several mths. ago but they failed to state the obvious problems with the study and its attention grabbing conclusions. Anytime a scientist seeks attention by grabbing the media spotlight, waves a study around and starts yelling the sky is falling be careful. Real scientists don't work that way.
POINT -- THE PB FORUM WAS WAY IN FRONT OF THOSE GUYS AND GOT THE STORY (INFO) RIGHT.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|