Several thoughts and then I better get my butt to the office:
With Theo's math, I'm sure that Ken H had lots of failures along the way but stayed with it. He did have the advantage of others prior research which had to help. With that many permutations, the results would appear to be unpredictable and without documentation, positive results don't seem possible. I expect it is very well documented but I can't blame him for keeping his mouth shut. I have no idea what combinations of "stuff" and their mixtures go into Cokes, Dr. Peppers, soap and many other products and maybe it ought to worry me but doesn't. I have investigated Budweiser and it seems acceptable.
Ken has created, for lack of a better word, a mutt. Heck, some of my best, most productive dogs have been mutts and,looking into my own rear view mirror, I guess I am too. And, I turned out GREAT! Future inbred generations of the GG absolutely have to turn into something like European royalty. At least ponders can use Rotenone to make corrections if they choose or maybe turn some predators loose on them. But, he admits this and ponders need to understand their goals. I think he ought to emphazise this and maybe does.
Last, Theo is obviously more than just a pretty face.
