Frank :

Glad to clear things up. The range/average of all blue dot fish have moved up from below 100% to at or above 100%. That is how the chart appears to me. I am looking at this by year class to see movements as a group. One fish tells you a little but a group tells a lot better story as an indicator of what is going on in the pond. The blue dot central group are getting closer together in length and weight and are moving as a whole to a better RW status. To me that means they all are getting enough to eat and the pond has all the qualities to meet their needs and allow them to reach their genetic potential.

In the biological sense fish condition (some times referred to as K or Kr = relative condition) is not the end in and of its self but is one measure of a pond as a biological system . Think about it this way -- the fish as assessed are a (one) reflection/indicator of pond health and ability to meet its potential. This would include not only forage/food but water quality and the absence of serious fish stressors (harmful bacteria ,pathogens, crowding etc.).

I hope this helps and keep asking and I will try to answer.

After looking back at the charts and Greg's comment I should point out that we talked about fertilizer programs in Atlanta. In that regard keep in mind that RW or Kr are made against a statistical norm. They are not a comparison of your pond/fish against those of pond X which has a much higher trophic ability. If , as Greg notes, several other people with the same age/type/genetic potential fish are doing better (as in they have a couple 5lbers)that may well be because their pond has a higher ability to produce (trophic level) which you can not achieve with your pond as is. The best manager may not be able to do better than you have with your pond conditions.