|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,672
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561
|
|
|
2 members (jludwig, 10x),
6,393
guests, and
120
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 36 |
Hi Folks: This is more just an experiment to see if I can actually post pictures for future reference. Here is a series of shots combined into one panoramic view of the pond where a small group of us have stocked about 1,400 Rainbows. Area is roughly 3.5 acres, 650 ft x 230 ft average, and up to 25 ft deep ... in most places its about 15 ft. This pond was a small semi-private sand & gravel pit that was abandoned approximately 50 years ago due to problems with underground springs making it too difficult to keep clear. Over the last 50 years, it has become a full eco-system with freshwater shrimp, caddisflies, dragonfly nymphs, etc. This pond will become "mine" next spring when I sign a lease with the landowner ... 5 years with a second 5 yr option. The fish seem to be doing well on natural food only .. a test netting last week brought up some very beautiful trout a foot long. Next spring we'll be installing 2 Koender windmills that we got at a very fair price but need a little TLC to bring them back to full functionality to try and keep the algae growth down a little and overall improve water quality. Regards to all, Lee Smith 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,435
Ambassador Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,435 |
Hi Lee, I don't see any pictures???
Just do it...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 36 |
Yeah ... took me about 15 tries to get it working ... I hadn't made it accessable to the public.
Looks like it works now though ... all a part of the learning process.
Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 417
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 417 |
Does anyone know why some pictures are small and some make me scroll horizontlly? I don't like the really big ones myself.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,676 Likes: 509
Moderator Lunker
|
|
Moderator Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,676 Likes: 509 |
Brian:
It all depends on the size of the picture (pixel width, not necessarily related to file size).
I do not have it down to an exact science yet, but I know that if I set my (wife's, actually) digital camera on "Email" quality pics, they will fit in the standard screen width when posting. If I take 5Mpixel quality, they are too wide to fit on one screen, and I have to resize (rescale) them with a photo processing program before posting if I want them to fit.
"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever." -S. M. Stirling
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,027
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3 |
Originally posted by Theo Gallus: [QB] It all depends on the size of the picture (pixel width, not necessarily related to file size).QB] I am a Navy Photographer and deal with this quite frequently. For Horizontals, try starting with 640 wide X 480 high. For Verticals, I just set the height to 500, and that usually works for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,934 Likes: 2
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,934 Likes: 2 |
Doogie is right on the money. 640 wide x 480 hi is the ideal internet "no scroll required" dimension. When using the photo-processing programs, it is a regular option due to popularity. If you right click on the picture, then left click on the properties, you can see the size.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|