I have no self-interest in the GGs, however, I've been following this thread.

As others have stated, there are simply two things to be evaluated, and they could be evaluated at the same time:

1) The Georgia Giant itself

2) The Holyoak method of stocking

However, the Holyoak method of stocking will put quite a pinch on Gator's wallet. Obviously, this is Gator's pond, and I haven't heard anyone coming up with any subsidized funds for his project; therefore, he is the final decision maker.

But, there are enough "fish" scientists available on this forum to give proper instructions on how to document this. Then it's finally up to Gator what he wants to do.

Bill, you've certainly pulled out the "big guns" of your experience and education. I certainly don't think you are too harsh though. More importantly, I feel you are giving Holyoak a taste of what expertise exists here on the forum.

This could be a very slippery slope for Holyoak.

Again, not that I personally care, but Deb, I assume your employer knows what you're getting Holyoak into here?


Excerpt from Robert Crais' "The Monkey's Raincoat:"
"She took another microscopic bite of her sandwich, then pushed it away. Maybe she absorbed nutrients from her surroundings."