Pond Boss Forums INTRO Questions & Observations Georgia Giant Put to the Test?

I have another comment on the stocking density topic regarding Alligator's GG test study.

I propose that before Gator does the final stocking, the active and interested board members arrive at a consensis of how Gator should conduct this study. However, we can easily leave it up to Gator and Deb to see what transpires. My ramblings will do nothing but probably thoroughly confuse Gator who probably is not well versed in topics of fishery management as an art and science.

Regarding stocking density of Georgia Giant hybrids. Deb agrees that growth potential is probably similar in GG stocked at a low or high density providing certain conditions are met in each case.

On one extreme, we put one fish in Gator's pond whereas at the other extreme we stock at Deb's high density of 400 GG in abt 5600 sqft (75'x75')and abt 8 ft deep, +/- 2'.

Deb's stocking idea is recommending relatively high dollars and maintence considering that Gator does not live on site and an electric aerator may be somewhat of a problem for him.

I think that somewhere in between one fish and 400 fish in the small pond there is a density of GG that will grow optimally WITHOUT aeration. I contend that aeration, at least in aquaculture settings, is primarily for minimizing fish stress and or kills in high carrying capacities combined with heavy feeding regimes. Reduce the carrying capacity (density) and adequately feed fewer fish and the need for aeration is deminished, yet optimum growth is hopefuly achieved. This fish management theory or method has worked previously with other species of fish, in many instances including natural and artificial settings, where some had deep, thermally, stratified water.

I do not understand why Gator cannot do this study, achieve the GG growth goals and not have to aerate his pond. What am I missing about this project?.