Originally posted by LBuck:
There's a big difference between "continued attacks" and agressive questioning.
LBuck,
I'm happy to change my words to "aggressive questioning"...in fact, will do so, if that detracts from answering the basic questions I posed to Bob Lusk.
My questions, however, remain...what exactly is wrong with hearing other opinions, other views, and making up our own minds? What is wrong with giving Ken and Deb the opportunity to present those views? In the face of having your business and integrity questioned, isn't it customary and accepted procedure to give the accused a chance to present their views?
