|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,660
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
1 members (4CornersPuddle),
1,125
guests, and
97
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,993 Likes: 1496
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,993 Likes: 1496 |
esshup has the info correct. Now that a lot of the algae is windrowed up against the shore, I would remove as much as you can then treat the remaining leftovers. This results in using less algaecide. Removing FA removes the nutrients that it absorbed to grow abundantly and then it is not dead / dying /decomposing making muck and releasing nutrients on the pond bottom. The chemical killing the algae in that area is also killing the decomposing bacteria who will hopefully decay the dead stuff. Bacteria has to repopulate first then they can decompose. Firstly remove as much FA as practical then treat. Remember excess nutrient buildup in the pond is what causes the FA to grow.
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|