|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,680
Members19,115
| |
Most Online23,413 9 hours ago
|
|
|
1 members (Theo Gallus),
15,475
guests, and
266
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295 |
You'd be surprised. Nothing has to be done quickly. It's more cost effective to form a plan first, figuring out your goals for the pond. Then take steps to implement those goals. The key is not to do something that you have to undo to do something later. Less $$ wasted that way.
Figure out your goals for the fishery. Larger bass and smaller bluegill? Up to 10" bluegill and 5#-6# bass? 12"+, 2# bluegill and lots of 12"-14" bass? There are lots of other options too. Once that is determined, an electroshock survey can be done to assess the fish population and at the same time fish can be removed that don't help you reach your fishery goals. Then once the population is assessed, a plan can be made to help you reach those goals.
Galvanized Gee Minnow Traps or Z-Traps can be used to sample smaller fish. Cheap and you can do that. A Fyke Net can be purchased, and used, but you need a boat if you don't have one. That would cost pretty close to what an electroshock survey would cost, and LMB don't go into a fyke net.
|
|
1 member likes this:
polarbeard |
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|