|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,671
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,012
Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
0 members (),
7,242
guests, and
126
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,033 Likes: 483
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,033 Likes: 483 |
"If non-catchability is an inheritable trait, then why did selected fish that did not prove vulnerable to angling (were not caught) have offspring that were in fact vulnerable to angling?"
The point is over time the catchability of the population of LMB became lower and lower. If the % of catchable LMB decreases from 60% to 20% you have a problem. It is insignificant that some few offspring are catchable. That is even a decreasing % over time as well.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
|
|
.gif)
