|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,671
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
0 members (),
7,242
guests, and
126
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,996 Likes: 1496
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,996 Likes: 1496 |
For those interested in generational genetic vulnerability of LMB to angling discussed in the Forum here is the summary of the article that has been discussed
Selection for Vulnerability to Angling in Largemouth Bass by David P. Philipp et.al Abstract Although a great deal of effort has been expended to try to understand the consequences of fishing-induced selection by commercial fisheries, relatively little effort has been put into trying to understand the selective effects of recreational angling. We conducted a long-term selection experiment to assess the heritability of vulnerability to angling in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Three successive generations of artificially selected largemouth bass were produced from a single experimental study population. Within each generation, individual adult largemouth bass were identified as having either high or low vulnerability to angling through a series of controlled catch-and-release angling trials. Individuals of each vulnerability group (high and low) were then selected from that population for breeding to produce the next generation. The response to selection for vulnerability to angling increased with each generation; that is, the magnitude of the difference between the high- and low-vulnerability groups of fish increased with each successive generation. Realized heritability was calculated as 0.146 (r2 = 0.995), indicating that the vulnerability of largemouth bass to angling is indeed a heritable trait. Our results indicate that recreational angling has the potential to alter the gene pool of wild fish populations, which may indirectly affect population characteristics such as survival, growth rate, and reproductive output as well as directly affecting angling success rates.
In summary to repeat what ewest has posted: "Catch-and-release angling provides fish a direct negative learning experience and rarely results in mortality. Fish live another day but adapt and learn lure avoidance. Keep in mind that these biters are the aggressive fish which are now less apt to bite again. In addition the non-biters learn lure avoidance from watching which reinforces the negative man made selection process. In short fishing is selecting (encouraging) the fish not to bite. On the other hand if we remove the fish we catch we have removed the best most aggressive fish, speeding up the bad genetic change. For pond owners this is a lose-lose proposition. Because non-catchability in recreational angling has been demonstrated to be an inherited trait over time (a couple of years) we can quickly have a pond full of non-catchable fish."
Last edited by Bill Cody; 11/11/25 08:41 PM.
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
2 members like this:
ewest, 4CornersPuddle |
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|