|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
1 members (RichardinFL),
8,046
guests, and
180
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 Likes: 1
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 Likes: 1 |
Ml- I should have wordered that better. Yes 6 lb or larger size are harder to catch they have made through a few years of fishing pressure.
My point was that fewer but healtheir bass in 3-5 lb range, which are awesome hard fighting bass that most people only dream of catching, would be as easy to catch as the little dinks he caught in the past. It is simple math you will not catch as many b/c not as many total bass in the pond since average bass size is greater. However lb wise I bet with all else being equal it is the same. You disagree (I think) but what do other think?
Clarify b/c I would like to see opinion of others, can you catch as many lbs of bass in a pond with lets say 100 3 lb bass or would you catch more lbs in a pond with 300 1 lb bass? Duh number higher in #2 but what about lbs.? thanks
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|