12 females, even if only 3"-4" in length should produce a fair amount of fingerlings. That 25 number was gnawing at me in way that got me thinking ... you've seen that number before. It was in a Todd Overton post on RES:

Quote
In 2004 we stocked out about 25 3"-4" redears in 1/2 acre then harvest about 10,000 1"-3" fish in the fall. Reproductive potential is about 25% of bluegill potential based on one season of farm production with same number of brooders in same size pond.

I presume a similar stocking of 25 BG in the 3"-4" sizes could produce 40,000 fingerlings based on his comment. 6"-8" brood females could produce as much as 8 times as many eggs so somewhere between 40,000 and 320,000 fingerlings potential.

Was kind of wondering why Todd would use small (probably unsexed) brooders as brood. But it made a lot of sense from this perspective. The first cohort was probably relatively small and these could reach 3" but not be too numerous to allow a second larger cohort. I suspect almost all the fingerlings recovered are from the first 2 spawns and most from the 2nd. Additional attempts to spawn probably would be unsuccessful because of the huge standing population of fingerling BG.


It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers