Quote
Please explain how to post pics, if there's a simpler way! Honesty, I have no idea why it should be difficult....other forums I go to it's simple.
I totally agree. Amen. Amen. It is why I don't post pics here. As an example go back several years ago and look at those "scarred up" - defaced Photo-Bucket pictures that were very often used back then. IMO all those old pics are basically worthless today.

Rock Piles - IMO it would be more beneficial if those piles were at least 3 times longer and maybe a few of them start a foot shallower down to current depth in the pics. IMO Each of those current sizes of rock piles will not support very many crayfish. Depth placement is pretty good. One has to remember rock piles are primarily for small fish habitat as feeding areas (colonizing invertebrates) and refuge spaces. For better rocky habitat one whole shoreline should have a continuous rock pile although the height of the pile would not need to be as tall as those in the picture. IMO Two to three rock layers of height would be adequate.
Adding tree top brush between the current rock piles would improve the habitat complexity.

Last edited by Bill Cody; 02/08/25 09:15 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management