|
Forums36
Topics42,112
Posts571,657
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
8 members (jludwig, Sunil, Pond Star, Theo Gallus, ewest, Terry Battisti, emactxag, Bill Cody),
2,601
guests, and
53
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295 |
Look, indoor rearing of LMB from swim up fry to fingerling stages isn't uncomplicated and it is not widely or commonly practiced. I hadn't done a google search on it in a few years but my library literally has no papers on the subject. I just googled today and found this : https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/cr...-critical-early-life-history-stages.htmlFrom their summary: Largemouth bass (LMB) is a high-value freshwater aquaculture species with a rapidly expanding food fish market in North America. However, current rearing practices depend on uncontrollable pond-based technologies plagued by high mortality, especially during the early life stages (i.e., egg to early fingerlings). As such, complete indoor intensive culture of LMB would improve production yields by circumventing the high rates of mortality associated with these initial pond stages. The goal: Our long-term goal is to develop intensive indoor rearing strategies for a commercially important food fish (largemouth bass) during the critical early life stages. The results of this study will be made available to the public in the 2027 - 2028 time frame I suspect. The project was funded and began last year and will be competed in 2027. They are going to try a number of prospective strategies feeding cultured live foods (rotifers and artemia) and then transitioning to feed. It will be interesting to see which of the strategies work best. The main differences between strategies will be the age when live food is eliminated. It may not be widely publicized, but that is the difference between sitting in an office or house looking at the computer for data instead of getting out in the real world, getting your hands dirty and getting hands on data. It's common in the fish hatchery business in Arkansas where they raise millions and millions of fish annually for pond stocking. Will a business publish a paper on how they do it? Why would they and give their competition a leg up on making $$? That would be business suicide. What is the definition of "widely or commonly practiced"? It's common in the fish raising business. A few years ago I picked up 30,000 3/4" LMB from a hatchery in Arkansas in early January and brought them to an indoor Recirculating Aquaculture facility in Ohio so they could be raised for pond stocking in late Spring. I'm sure that the hatchery in Arkansas didn't hold them since the natural spawning time of late April and starved them to keep them at that size - they were tiny chunky footballs when I picked them up. If you want to check on-line published data on manipulating spawning for predatory fish and how they are raised 100% indoors, look for a paper that was published by UW Stevens Point on spawning and raising Walleye for the food industry. They figured out how to spawn Walleye 12 months of the year, and they never saw pond water. IIRC it's about 60 pages.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|