|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,671
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
0 members (),
7,242
guests, and
126
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,996 Likes: 1496
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,996 Likes: 1496 |
George - This is how I would do it for your particular situation. You should know about how many stockers you put in the pond. At about 4"-6" initial size in a clean pond with forage fish I would "assume" at least 80%-90% survival on the low side. Subtract what you have removed and remainder is what is still in there. This number is a rough guess. Number of hits method of estimation of density could work but hits would have to be tabulated (estimated) within a one second period. HSB swim pretty fast and I think the same fish could easily create two "hits" within a two or three second period.
Example - 200 stockers minus 20 next day mortality, minus 40 (20% latent morts) equals abt 140 + -. Any number over 120 would be decent for your first attempt; 100 fair, and 60-80 poor.
Are you planning on draining the pond before restocking? Catching 90% of what reamins on hook and line and not draining and seining could be almost as challenging as cast netting.
I just drained a 7ft deep pond (60'x220') down to 20x157 and 16" deep. Seined it carefully twice. Killed what remained and got about a 5 gal bucket of fish that were bigger than the seine's mesh size. 98% of largest fish (greater than 5") were removed by seining.
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|