Oh, I've read many of them, so I can certainly judge any of them if I were to want to; I just don't want to.
Respectfully, Theo's question is valid especially set against the vast writings you've developed based on conversational and anecdotal information. So, from my perspective, if the foundation is weak to begin with (and that's no offense to the original poster, or you), then I don't really put any weight in any kind of scientific analysis based on stacked assumptions, let alone spend the time to read it. As such, I'm not bothered by it.
Obviously you enjoy writing.
