|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,661
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
2 members (jludwig, Knobber),
1,844
guests, and
101
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295 |
Esshup, the conversion of 6 to 1 is a decent estimate for all LMB in north Texas so long as one understands the conversion is for the excess over maintenance. In the example above the pond provides the maintenance. They won't grow without an excess of consumption above maintenance. Without the supplement the consumption is 6 times the weight of the LMB and the gain is zero. Because the gain is zero the FCR is infinite and is in fact meaningless. With consumption above maintenance, there can be conversion and a finite FCR. Here is an example.
An 8 lb is being supported by pond foods. If BG prey, that LMB consumes 48 lbs of BG each year to tread water Lets grow the 8 lb bass by 1 lb. It will need to consume an additional 6 lbs of BG. The FCR is (48 + 6)/1= 54. To gain 2 lbs requires additional 12 lbs. The FCR is ( 48 + 12)/2 = 30. To gain 3 lbs ? The FCR is ( 48 + 18)/3 = 22. Gross FCR varies depending on the consumption above the maintenance ration. The same thing also applies to formulated feeds.
Gains can be negative. Just take away some of their maintenance. They will decline to match what the consumption can maintain. Examples of taking away some maintenance? Stop fertilizing, stop feeding, use pond dye, fail to maintain alkalinity are a few examples. Even an exceptionally cloudy summer can adversely affect the production of food. So, you are saying a 1# LMB there needs 6# of forage to maintain, and a 10# LMB needs 60# of forage to maintain? (per year)
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|