Forums36
Topics41,109
Posts559,623
Members18,589
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
14 members (catscratch, Fishingadventure, Boondoggle, Retired on 40, H20fwler, Sunil, lmoore, Tinylake, chin_monster, WiPondGuy, Theo Gallus, Catch N 8 NTex, Jhust, DeerTexas),
1,221
guests, and
273
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28,725 Likes: 898
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent ![](images/stars.gif) Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent ![](images/stars.gif) Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28,725 Likes: 898 |
Mainer, that correlates to what I saw with the dewatering pumps. I upsized my outflow pipe from 3"-4" going to plastic pipe as soon as I could. Running the pump at a bit over idle reduced fuel consumption further, but I saw about a 50% reduction in water moved. Using a 6 gallon outboard motor tank as a remote tank I could run the pump for about 28 hours on 3/4 throttle, and about 23 hours on WOT. I had about 250 feet of 4" pipe on the discharge side to get it further away from the pond.
We will be starting a project as soon as we can get the OK from the county, and the contractor said that if the project needed to be dewatered, they'd dig a 30' deep french drain around the perimeter of the pond area, backfill and connect the drain to surface pumps. Last project they did they used 6 diesel pumps, each connected to the 6" french drain system. It was not cheap they said.
|
1 member likes this:
FishinRod |
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|