|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,676
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561 18 hours ago
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,025 Likes: 2
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,025 Likes: 2 |
ML, I didnt mean dont add lime. Just get the water tested first. With all the lawn(fertilizer) runoff and already with weed problems, wouldn't lime aid in the weeds processing the nutrients and adding to problem? Maybe I have it all wrong, probably. The aeration would aid in breaking down the nutrients also, as you said. I'm probably confused. I'm thinking that is why you are so against fertilizer; you already have plenty from the cattle? And when you fertilized, it was an overkill?
ps: ML, they told my neighbor in Miss. he needed lime for his garden, too, but I still got a good bloom.
don, ZEP, one flush, bactaclean, or specific pond bacteria are nothing more than beneficial aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and enzymes already present in the water. Adding them just gives a kick start to the cleanup process with the aid of bottom aeration. This particular ZEP product is not a chemical. It has been determined that some of the specific pond concoctions, even though much more expensive have many more bacteria spores per gram, so whatever you get, cost is effectively the same.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|