|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,661
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
2 members (jludwig, Knobber),
1,844
guests, and
101
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 416
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 416 |
Species................J/g Wet......Author ===========......======......================ Black crappie........4186..........Kitchell et al. 1974 Bluegill..................4186..........Kitchell et al. 1974 Common carp.......7524..........Cummins and Wuycheck 1971 Golden shiner.......4983..........Kelso 1972 Green sunfish.......4186..........Kitchell et al. 1974 Largemouth Bass..4186.........Rice et al. 1983 Northern crayfish...6153.........Stein and Murphy 1976 Northern pike.........3600.........Bevelheimer et al. 1985 Rainbow trout.........6069.........Rand et al. 1993 Salex, Don't count out crayfish just yet. Notice their energy density. In that NP study the lake that recorded the most growth contained carp and crayfish as the primary sources of prey for NP. The NP growth in that lake blew away the other lakes which recorded growth right along the path that was then thought to be the maximum possible. So carp and crays pushed the envelope that redefined what the maximum path could be and what high energy prey can do. NP have exceptionally low energy density themselves and are consequently more sensitive to variation of prey energy density than predators of higher energy density. You may be interested in reading th...ve energy density of prey was discussed.
Last edited by jpsdad; 08/31/23 07:09 AM.
It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|