|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,671
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
3 members (10x, LeighAnn, DrLuke),
4,656
guests, and
151
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,387 Likes: 643
|
|
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,387 Likes: 643 |
Copied and pasted from original thread.. I think it needs to be here..
My first thought is I don't really see any beneficial type aquatic vegetation, like bulrush, arrowhead, etc. The older a pond is the more nutrients there will be-in general-if there is nothing present to "use" the nutrients. I see some filamentous algae growth-which is locked up excess nutrients, but a vicious cycle. You can kill it, but as it decomposes, nutrients are re-released back into the system and repeat. Aeration does not inhibit algae or aquatic vegetation, in fact in some cases I believe aeration can keep some sediment in suspension and make agal growth worse-there are ways to lesson that. We (I or anyone making an educated guess) need to see some samples of plants from the pond on a white-ish background (bottom of a 5gal bucket) to see the type of plants you have and ID them correctly. If you can post a pic or 2 of that, we can determine actual type and go from there.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|