Pond Boss Magazine
https://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
fiksegts2, Kirk78, Rgv, Kalispel, TokyoTim
19,114 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,666
Members19,114
Most Online13,012
Jun 7th, 2026
Top Posters
esshup 29,788
ewest 22,033
Cecil Baird1 20,043
Bill Cody 15,995
Who's Online Now
2 members (Bill Cody, LeighAnn), 1,729 guests, and 135 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 416
J
J Offline
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 416
Originally Posted by Pond Star
Would like to increase bass size while maintaining large crappie ................... asking too much ??

I don't think its too much ... provided ... your expectations of increasing bass size are modest.

Bill made some excellent points:

Quote
The larger the bass become the smaller the average size of crappie will be. The two different populations are tied together as a small bass / large crappie balance in several ways. Deleting or removing enough LMB in a 35 acre small lake to start to see development of some larger bass will be a really big challenge.

It would be good to understand the populations of LMB and Crappie in terms of biomass. This would give you the knowledge you need in order to understand the limit of what should be harvested of each species to maintain the fishery near its current balance. When I read your goal what I really see is that the maintaining crappie size is the primary goal. This is understandable because good crappie fisheries in impoundment like yours aren't really common. Your organization has an exceptional one and I think this isn't only due to the presence of many LMB but also due to absence of BG.

In support of Bill's first point, it will be a challenge to see LMB of much larger size. If your goal were an increase of length by 50% then (assuming relative weights remain consistent) the biomass of individuals would increase by 3.6 fold ... with an improvement of 10 RW we are talking 4 fold or more. This essentially means that all other things being equal ... in a lake that supports the current biomass of LMB ... 75% of the LMB numbers must be eliminated to grow 50% in length. To be sure, to remove that many would allow the Crappie to recruit more than they presently do and this would limit Crappie ultimate growth violating your primary goal.

What would be a good practice is to harvest both species as a form of maintenance. Harvest LMB to mostly to improve condition of LMB... and harvest Crappie to offset increased recruitment cause by harvesting LMB and reduce intra-species competition. Now I say maintenance because the water is already a great crappie fishery and this is the primary goal. Keep in mind that growth follows an equation that depends of two variables ... mortality biomass and recruitment biomass. Subtract the recruitment from the mortality and what you have is a biomass that represents under utilized carrying capacity that can be gained by adult fish (not YOY recruits which we subtracted). For a lake at carrying capacity in terms of its fish biomass, there is no growth without mortality. Harvesting introduces mortality and makes room for individual growth. If you harvest 20% of the biomass (if all length categories equally benefit) then there will be an increase in length of 6%. So back to being modest about expectations, that is not even an inch for 12" fish. If RW improves it is even less increase in length. You will not be able to maintain the Crappie fishery and substantially improve the LMB. Just consider the LMB a harvestable means to the end of a remarkable Crappie fishery.

Quote
If something is done to change the current fishery balance, EVERY angler should start recording ALL sizes and numbers of every fish caught both released and harvested to provide a data baseline to yearly monitor the changes that are occurring in the balance and size structure of the two fishery populations.

I would like to suggest using lengths as quick efficient way to manage the metrics. Yes, it doesn't tell one the RW or the exact weight of the fish caught or removed ... but I can guarantee that in a situation like the OPs that everyone isn't going to individually weigh fish. Some may even resent having to buy a scale of sufficient quality to do it right. Using lengths is a surrogate method that can provide an effective metric for management in situations like this.

Probably the best way to keep track is a spreadsheet. I will add a spread sheet tonight that would work with multiple species and work with lengths.

Last edited by jpsdad; 08/08/23 08:12 AM.

It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers


Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,033
Likes: 483
E
Moderator
Hall of Fame 2014
Lunker
Moderator
Hall of Fame 2014
Lunker
E Online: Content
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,033
Likes: 483
Cell phone pics are much better way to estimate size and condition.

I tend toward Snipes suggestions as they have been designed (by Fishery biologists with the facts) recognized, implemented and been successful in similar situations. I have even seen a study or 2 on those examples.
















Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 133
Likes: 2
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 133
Likes: 2
I would like to thank each and everyone of you for taking the time to respond to my original question in such detail. You have given us things to think about that had never occurred to us in trying to obtain our goal of larger bass and hopefully retaining our large crappie. Sounds like our wish list may be a pretty tough thing to achieve given the interaction of the three species mentioned - BG, Crappie, and LMB.


[Linked Image from img.photobucket.com]
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Today's Birthdays
jkdolan, jkilmer83, lassig, Monty M, Randy H., Trent Aldridge
Recent Posts
Stop Feeding- Will Bass Return to Foraging ?
by Bill Cody - 09/16/26 01:59 PM
Gravel Pit Lake - Aeration ?
by WindowRock - 09/15/26 09:49 AM
Field and Stream Feeds?
by Bill Cody - 09/14/26 07:37 PM
Newbie from Colorado
by ewest - 09/14/26 03:34 PM
New Pond Update...
by ewest - 09/14/26 03:27 PM
Too much forage?
by Jst4Fun - 09/14/26 01:09 PM
Lotus variety of nice color
by gehajake - 09/13/26 02:07 PM
Billboard Tarp Pond
by jason7858 - 09/11/26 05:21 PM
LMB in 1 ac pond
by Terry Battisti - 09/11/26 04:10 PM
Previous lurker from Dayton, Ohio!
by ewest - 09/10/26 10:03 AM
Chestnut other trees for wildlife
by Scooter_Trash - 09/09/26 09:54 PM
Introduction
by Terry Battisti - 09/09/26 09:52 PM
Newly Uploaded Images
Uninvited crappie pictures
Uninvited crappie pictures
by fishwife, June 16
Chestnuts this afternoon
Chestnuts this afternoon
by Rangersedge, May 21
Trackhoe
Trackhoe
by Rangersedge, January 24
Thanksgiving RES
Thanksgiving RES
by Shorty, November 27
Nice 12 Inch BGxRES
Nice 12 Inch BGxRES
by Theo Gallus, June 1
F1 Bass stocked 6/24 caught 3/30/25
F1 Bass stocked 6/24 caught 3/30/25
by lafarmpondguy, March 31

� 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1