|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564
17 hours ago
|
|
|
1 members (RichardinFL),
6,961
guests, and
153
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 8
|
|
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 8 |
My pond is fed by a small stream and has a spillway that drains back into the stream on the other side. The stream basically starts on my 6 acres. Much of the watershed for the stream is a commercial orchard maybe 4-500 yards away from my pond. What, if anything, should I be concerned about? Should I have my water tested? If so, where should I look for testing to be done?
Thanks,
Wally
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,869 Likes: 303
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,869 Likes: 303 |
My pond is fed by a small stream and has a spillway that drains back into the stream on the other side. The stream basically starts on my 6 acres. Much of the watershed for the stream is a commercial orchard maybe 4-500 yards away from my pond. What, if anything, should I be concerned about? Should I have my water tested? If so, where should I look for testing to be done?
Thanks,
Wally Wally, testing would be smart. You also might contact the folks who run the orchard as to what chemicals they use & when. The greatest danger would likely be rain right after application, which would drain into your pond.
7ac 2015 CNBG RES FHM 2016 TP FLMB 2017 NLMB GSH L 2018 TP & 70 HSB PK 2019 TP RBT 2020 TFS TP 25 HSB 250 F1,L,RBT -206 2021 TFS TP GSH L,-312 2022 GSH TP CR TFS RBT -234, 2023 BG TP TFS NLMB, -160
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 416
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 416 |
I agree with anthropic that the greatest risk is rain following application. Keep in mind that the orchard is producing food and so the chemicals used necessarily degrade rapidly so as to be at acceptable concentrations for consumption by human when marketed. The orchard keeper doesn't want to waste chemical treatments by losing the application to rain and so this consideration will affect timing of applications based on weather forecasts. The timing of applications in fair weather should reduce any risks you may face.
It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295 |
I agree with anthropic that the greatest risk is rain following application. Keep in mind that the orchard is producing food and so the chemicals used necessarily degrade rapidly so as to be at acceptable concentrations for consumption by human when marketed. The orchard keeper doesn't want to waste chemical treatments by losing the application to rain and so this consideration will affect timing of applications based on weather forecasts. The timing of applications in fair weather should reduce any risks you may face. Very correct. It's also in the farmers best interest to time applications and to calculate the amount of herbicides and pesticides used to minimize the input costs to help keep profit margins up.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,807 Likes: 340
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,807 Likes: 340 |
I cannot imagine such a rational discussion anywhere else except on the Pond Boss Forum!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295 |
I cannot imagine such a rational discussion anywhere else except on the Pond Boss Forum! Bob has tasked us Mods to run a tight ship. 
|
|
1 member likes this:
RAH |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,897 Likes: 63
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,897 Likes: 63 |
I would test the water regularly to establish a base line. This way you have evidence of water chemistry changes.
|
|
1 member likes this:
gehajake |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,083 Likes: 284
|
|
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,083 Likes: 284 |
I would test the water regularly to establish a base line. This way you have evidence of water chemistry changes. This makes a lot of sense, want to have a little information to back up your theories, can't just assume there are chemicals running downhill from an orchard. I would think the grass and other vegetation would filter a huge amount of it, personally I would rather have that then a corn field.
All the really good ideas I've ever had came to me while I was milking a cow.
|
|
1 member likes this:
jludwig |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,897 Likes: 63
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,897 Likes: 63 |
I would test the water regularly to establish a base line. This way you have evidence of water chemistry changes. This makes a lot of sense, want to have a little information to back up your theories, can't just assume there are chemicals running downhill from an orchard. I would think the grass and other vegetation would filter a huge amount of it, personally I would rather have that then a corn field. Correct. Once you have water chemistry changes, then it's about finding the source.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
![[Linked Image from lh6.ggpht.com]](https://lh6.ggpht.com/_6_-SgakQ9co/S3Nx1jGAJWI/AAAAAAAABKU/DJIy4ZnF1t0/s800/I_subscribe.jpg)
