|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,700
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
8 members (Theo Gallus, catscratch, J. E. Craig, gehajake, FishinRod, WindowRock, jludwig, emactxag),
3,169
guests, and
611
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,924 Likes: 1004
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,924 Likes: 1004 |
There has been just enough rain in the drainage basin for our creek that it has once again started to flow.
I checked the deepest hole yesterday, and was surprised to see the usual ball of CC fingerlings.
All of the fish are approximately the same size, which I estimate to be 7" long. They look healthy, but their heads look a little too large to me, so I assume they are partially stunted.
The creek went dry last fall, except for a few deep holes - which became stagnant and choked with algae. The water is flowing now, and I see GSF, LMB, gambusia, and some other minnows in the deep holes. However, I suspect the period of "dry creek" did some significant damage to the food chain.
Question 1: Are these fingerlings the right size for an early summer spawn from last year?
Question 2: Would these fingerlings could be a good test for the theory concerning fish that lose growth in their early life cycle have a reduced growth rate, even if they are subsequently placed into a favorable environment?
IF, I ever get a chance to install my CC pond, I was contemplating fin-clipping some CC from the creek and starting them at the same time as the stocker CC. I am going to try to have the CC NOT spawn in the pond, so I am not worried much about hurting the genetic line of the commercial CC.
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|