|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,661
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,792
guests, and
104
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295 |
Bob, I agree with you. The science gives us a great foundation to build upon. The thing that I find a bit off is quoting data that is anywhere from 49 to 88 years old as the way to do things now. That would be the same as saying that if you wanted to buy a new Ford car today, the best one to get is anything from a 1934 Deluxe Ford Tudor to a 1972 Ford Pinto.
Technology has changed greatly in those intervening years, and so has what we know about ponds. The basics are there, but we have progressed so much farther past the basics. There are so many variables that weren't considered back then, it's mind boggling. What was written in stone back then may still be written in stone, but I wouldn't want to place a large wager on it.
Look at Julius Poppe. If we still went by his pond management writings for food fish in ponds, there would be no reason to stock anything other than common carp in ponds.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|