We are truly fortunate to have a choice of good BG feeds these days. Speaking personally, I've been quite happy with both AquaMax and Optimal, and fish seem to agree. Optimal more expensive, maybe worth it. If I had a naturally fertile pond, the FA deal would be important, but that's definitely not my issue.

Assuming that FA actually does grow less in Optimal fed ponds, is that because fish turn it into flesh more efficiently?

Last edited by anthropic; 03/18/22 09:03 PM.
7ac 2015 CNBG RES FHM 2016 TP FLMB 2017 NLMB GSH L 2018 TP & 70 HSB PK 2019 TP RBT 2020 TFS TP 25 HSB 250 F1,L,RBT -206 2021 TFS TP GSH L,-312 2022 GSH TP CR TFS RBT -234, 2023 BG TP TFS NLMB, -160