|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
0 members (),
8,194
guests, and
163
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 416
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 416 |
travlinman, how is your population of 7.25 to 9.5 inch BG? If bass really need prey that is 1/4 to 1/3 their length, and you have a lot of them, then it should easily grow to 20 lbs in year and you could boast the state record. But if you have a whole bunch of 7.25 to 9.5 in BG and it really needs 5 to 6 in BG, its going to start starving from the time you put it in.
IMHO the 7 lb bass that represent the top of your food chain will allow very little food to pass to the size this 16 lb LMB optimally needs. But if there are a lot of 7.25 to 9.5 inch BG while BG in the 5in to 7in sizes are relatively uncommon ... this would be a great test of whether that big bass needs 7.25 to 9.5 BG or whether it need 5" to 6" BG. Here are the risks to you:
If the 16 lb LMB needs 7.25 to 9.5 in BG, you might find that consumption of these BG will stress the production of BG YOY that will be evident a year from now as reduced LMB RW of the existing population. You would see good growth and relative weight of the 16 lb LMB.
If the 16 lb LMB needs 5 to 6 in BG, there is little risk to you. The 16 lber will probably decline substantially while the existing population is not much affected. The choice is yours but I think the likely outcome is the second one.
It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so - Will Rogers
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|