|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,346 Likes: 108
|
|
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,346 Likes: 108 |
With your swamp situation...I would just estimate the major majority of the pond, but I invite others opinions on the matter.
Without seeing the pond or, at least, a good sketch of the pond (and swamp) with depths indicated...it's hard to detemine how much I would include of the swampy areas in the gallon estimate. 4.3 acres of swamp around a 0.7 acre pond could shift the calcualtions greatly depending on swamp depths and how readily availible the swamp waters are to the churning of the aeration system.
As for muck reductions from aeration...I'll leave that discussion to those more in the know. My pond was refurbished and one of the benefits of adding aeration was considered to be a tool to fight muck build-up, not necessarily to reduce it (I had none to reduce).
Fish on!, Noel 
|
|
1 member likes this:
Linden Pond |
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|